Search Criteria
Package Details: cppfront-git v0.7.1.r33.gbe17724-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/cppfront-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | cppfront-git |
Description: | Compiler for an experimental C++ 'syntax 2' (Cpp2) |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/hsutter/cppfront |
Licenses: | CCPL |
Submitter: | patatahooligan |
Maintainer: | patatahooligan |
Last Packager: | patatahooligan |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2022-09-22 19:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-07-24 22:32 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
patatahooligan commented on 2022-12-21 00:32 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-23 12:52 (UTC) by patatahooligan)
It seems that upstream commit c39a94cb breaks the build. I'll look into it when I have time and possibly open an upstream bug report. Until then manually select a commit before c39a94cb or simply don't upgrade.
EDIT 2022-12-23: seems to be fixed, package builds for me on b59f539
patatahooligan commented on 2022-11-14 14:30 (UTC)
@prokoprandacek I added
${CXXFLAGS}
to the arguments ofg++
. This should include-O2
by default, but also a bunch of other flags and potentially your own additions. You can view and modify these flags in/etc/makepkg.conf
. To my understanding, this is the interface that PKGBUILDs should respect instead of manually setting optimization levels and other flags.patatahooligan commented on 2022-11-14 01:57 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-14 14:21 (UTC) by patatahooligan)
@prokoprandacek I thought
g++
was supposed to respect CXXFLAGS from makepkg.conf (and CXXFLAGS should set optimization levels), but now I'm not so sure. I opened a topic about it here as well: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=281264prokoprandacek commented on 2022-11-12 19:17 (UTC)
Hi, Can you add
-O2
to the gcc flags? Thanks