Package Details: crc-bin 2.38.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/crc-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: crc-bin
Description: Red Hat CodeReady Containers is a tool that manages a local OpenShift 4.x cluster optimized for testing and development purposes
Upstream URL: https://github.com/code-ready/crc
Licenses: Apache
Provides: crc
Submitter: majora
Maintainer: sgar
Last Packager: sgar
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-26 18:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-09 19:29 (UTC)

Latest Comments

sgar commented on 2023-11-28 16:39 (UTC)

checksum seems correct, clean your workspace from an old crc-linux-amd64.tar.xz

dan361 commented on 2023-11-28 16:36 (UTC)

2.29.0 broken because of checksum issue

 PKGBUILDs up to date
fetching devel info...
==> Making package: crc-bin 2.29.0-2 (Tue Nov 28 17:27:49 2023)
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found crc-linux-amd64.tar.xz
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    crc-linux-amd64.tar.xz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
error: failed to download sources for 'crc-bin-2.29.0-2': 
error: packages failed to build: crc-bin-2.29.0-2

berquist commented on 2023-09-06 12:58 (UTC)

The 2.25.0 update needs a checksum update again.

tkolo commented on 2023-08-17 23:46 (UTC)

2.24.1 has the checksum issue:

==> Making package: crc-bin 2.24.1-1 (Fri Aug 18 01:45:18 2023)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found crc-linux-amd64.tar.xz
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    crc-linux-amd64.tar.xz ... FAILED

sgar commented on 2023-08-08 18:21 (UTC)

@berquist it works for the current 2.23.0 version, or which problem do u mean exactly?

berquist commented on 2023-08-05 20:50 (UTC)

There is a problem with the checksum.

a821 commented on 2023-06-20 07:49 (UTC)

@sgar: Why do you want to delete the package if @agilob wants to adopt it? can you just orphan it? Your deletion request (PRQ#42402) makes no sense.

Sacro commented on 2023-06-13 23:11 (UTC)

Can this depend on "qemu" rather than "qemu-base"

agilob commented on 2023-05-23 16:41 (UTC)

Can you update this please or leave as a maintainer?