Just adding extracted cursor-stable is enough. AppImage and -electron is already unstable by multicall-binary issue or ABI issue.
Downgrading to stable -bin needs epoch=1.
Search Criteria
Package Details: cursor-bin 0.51.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/cursor-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | cursor-bin |
| Description: | Cursor App - AI-first coding environment |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.cursor.com/ |
| Licenses: | custom:proprietary |
| Submitter: | g.schulz |
| Maintainer: | g.schulz |
| Last Packager: | g.schulz |
| Votes: | 52 |
| Popularity: | 8.21 |
| First Submitted: | 2024-06-09 14:27 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-05-31 00:26 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (1)
Sources (4)
oech3 commented on 2025-05-18 11:31 (UTC)
g.schulz commented on 2025-05-18 10:21 (UTC)
I would like to make a small poll whether we should move to "stable" instead of "latest". Thank you @vitaliikuzhdin for pointing this out
g.schulz commented on 2025-05-18 10:16 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-18 10:23 (UTC) by g.schulz)
@oech thank you for your input. Personally I feel 6 packages may be overkill, but I am not opposed to it if I get PRs for that. Also thank you for the PRs you have opened, I will look at them within the next few days.
oech3 commented on 2025-05-17 12:45 (UTC)
@g.schulz Thankyou. I moved everything to there.
Should we have 6 cursor-* packages?
g.schulz commented on 2025-05-17 08:01 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-18 10:16 (UTC) by g.schulz)
For anyone who want's to contribute a PR, this is the repo: https://github.com/Gunther-Schulz/aur-cursor-bin-updater
oech3 commented on 2025-05-16 09:47 (UTC)
@arch-lsf I don't see your ABI issue. Are you updated your system ?
Try also corsor-extracted or cursor-electron.
Pinned Comments
g.schulz commented on 2025-05-17 08:01 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-18 10:16 (UTC) by g.schulz)
For anyone who want's to contribute a PR, this is the repo: https://github.com/Gunther-Schulz/aur-cursor-bin-updater