As mentioned in the PKGBUILD this package now relies on Qt6 and KF6 build dependencies.
Subsequently Qt5/KF5 dependencies have been dropped.
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/darkly-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | darkly-bin |
| Description: | Fork of Lightly (A modern style for Qt applications) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/Bali10050/darkly |
| Keywords: | plasma6-application-style |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Conflicts: | darkly |
| Submitter: | DeltaCopy |
| Maintainer: | DeltaCopy |
| Last Packager: | DeltaCopy |
| Votes: | 27 |
| Popularity: | 2.49 |
| First Submitted: | 2024-12-21 22:18 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-08-31 09:10 (UTC) |
As mentioned in the PKGBUILD this package now relies on Qt6 and KF6 build dependencies.
Subsequently Qt5/KF5 dependencies have been dropped.
Seems like it's ok at this point to remove the QT5 dependencies.
Should frameworkintegration be in the dependencies list too? Without the package, my qt6 applications cannot use Darkly properly.
UPDATE: Never mind, works now after clearing paru's cache.
Can't install:
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
darkly-0.5.17-x86_64.pkg.zst ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
error: failed to download sources for 'darkly-bin-0.5.17-1':
error: packages failed to build: darkly-bin-0.5.17-1
@wizard-28
The source had changed on GitHub for some reason, even though a new version had not been released. Anyway I have aligned the sha256sum with the new one and it should now work.
sha256sum is wrong for version 0.5.17.
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
darkly-0.5.17-x86_64.pkg.zst ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
at last!! good.
Pinned Comments
DeltaCopy commented on 2026-08-31 08:55 (UTC)
As mentioned in the PKGBUILD this package now relies on Qt6 and KF6 build dependencies.
Subsequently Qt5/KF5 dependencies have been dropped.