Package Details: dart-sdk-dev 3.12.0_221.0.dev-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/dart-sdk-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: dart-sdk-dev
Description: The official Dart sdk from dart-lang project (Development branch)
Upstream URL: https://www.dartlang.org/tools/sdk/archive
Keywords: dart dart-sdk dart-sdk-dev dart2 dartlang flutter
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: dart
Provides: dart
Submitter: KlarkKable
Maintainer: KlarkKable
Last Packager: KlarkKable
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.000002
First Submitted: 2018-04-19 09:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-03-11 00:02 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (13)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

dreieck commented on 2026-03-11 15:27 (UTC) (edited on 2026-03-11 15:37 (UTC) by dreieck)

Ahoj!,

many thanks for this package.

You install pre compiled binaries, so you should rename the package to
dart-sdk-dev-bin (i.e. with the -bin suffix).

To do so:

  • Create a new package named dart-sdk-dev-bin with the same build recipe as this package,
  • add to it replaces=("dart-sdk-dev<=3.12.0_221.0.dev") (version should be the latest version of the wrongly named package dart-sdk-dev),
  • add "dart-sdk-dev=${pkgver}" to the provides array,
  • submit dart-sdk-dev-bin to the AUR,
  • in dart-sdk-dev AUR package, submit a merge request to be merged into dart-sdk-dev-bin.

Further issues:

  • License identifier needs to be SPDX compliant: dart-sdk-dev E: custom is not a valid SPDX license identifier. See https://spdx.org/licenses/ for valid identifiers, or prefix the identifier with 'LicenseRef-', if it is custom.,
  • license file should be installed into /usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/.

Regards and thanks for maintaining!

GostLy commented on 2019-12-13 17:50 (UTC) (edited on 2019-12-13 17:56 (UTC) by GostLy)

Building dart-sdk-dev...
==> Making package: dart-sdk-dev 2.8.0_dev.0.0-1 (Fri 13 Dec 2019 12:26:45 PM EST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found dartsdk-linux-x64-release.zip
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    dartsdk-linux-x64-release.zip ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

I have to manually remove 'dartsdk-linux-x64-release.zip' before upgrading or else I get that error. Can you please do what @Huulivoide suggested and add ${pkgver} to the zip filename.

Huulivoide commented on 2019-10-16 20:27 (UTC)

I would recommend renaming the downloaded source file as it does not contain a version on it's name. Not having a version on the file name can lead to problems, if one building a new version in the same directory with a previous version. For example, when using a git clone if this package or installing with yay. Having an old version of the source archive will throw off makepkg, as it thinks the file has already been downloaded.

source=(dartsdk-linux-x64-release-${pkgver}.zip::https://…/dartsdk-linux-x64-release.zip)

should do the job.

yelkarch commented on 2019-05-25 17:15 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-25 17:18 (UTC) by yelkarch)

Please update the checksum:


dart-sdk-dev ±|master|→ makepkg -g
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found dartsdk-linux-x64-release.zip
==> Generating checksums for source files...
sha256sums=('1d73ece270078dcf86ac85bcf2d4556f242f90f8be5a6bb1ddf9afe05778efac')

ijann commented on 2019-02-01 22:02 (UTC)

This channel is connected to pacman GUI, not with gitlab, you will create problems not only for me, also for others who want to install it.

ijann commented on 2019-02-01 21:53 (UTC)

if you are going to be the updates from gitlab, the others will follow you, and where will this channel "AUR" be? This channel was made for that, show the repositories, I want to update from my pacman GUI without problems, Now I have to enter gitlab and solve it, that is wrong

ijann commented on 2019-02-01 21:49 (UTC)

it's wrong what you're holding, the packages are updated from AUR, not from gitlab, if you can not do it, leave the repository to someone else, I'm not interested if it's updated in gitlab, the update should be through this channel, What part do not stay clear?

ijann commented on 2019-02-01 20:54 (UTC)

Hello KlarkKable, Sorry, but the updates are made through of this channel AUR, not by gitlab, I would beg you not to neglect the updates in AUR. regards