Search Criteria
Package Details: dcm2niix 1.0.20230411-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/dcm2niix.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | dcm2niix |
Description: | A tool for converting images from the complicated formats used by scanner manufacturers (DICOM, PAR/REC) to the simple NIfTI format |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nitrc.org/projects/dcm2nii/ |
Licenses: | MIT, Public Domain |
Submitter: | wedjat |
Maintainer: | Roosted7 (liamtimms) |
Last Packager: | liamtimms |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2018-03-10 13:05 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-08-21 17:39 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- python-sphinx (python-sphinx-gitAUR) (make)
- yaml-cpp (make)
- pigz (pigz-gitAUR) (optional)
Latest Comments
liamtimms commented on 2020-03-31 13:09 (UTC) (edited on 2020-03-31 13:11 (UTC) by liamtimms)
@Roosted7 thanks for updating this. I will say that we use dcm2niix but not the rest of MRIcroGL so I have been using this separate package. That said, maybe I should just switch to
MRIcroGL
?@caleb I think you are right that it would be a better structure to make this a dependency but it looks like there is a pre-compiled version of
dcm2niix
included in MRIcroGL which upstream would need to provide an option to separate out.The dcm2niix page github page implies they are different builds saying,
and,
so it seems like this dcm2niix and the dcm2niix included in MRIcroGL are not exactly the same.
alerque commented on 2020-03-31 09:56 (UTC)
@Roosted7 I think the correct approach for Arch packages here would be to remove the bundled version of this from the mricrogl packaging and make it depend on this one instead.
Roosted7 commented on 2020-03-31 09:30 (UTC)
It's updated now! I'm thinking of removing this package, since dcm2niix is included and synced with MRIcroGL - which I am also packaging. Is there interest in a dcm2niix-only package still?
astewartau commented on 2020-03-30 12:29 (UTC)
Thanks very much for this package! I noticed it is now a little out-of-date. Can we update to the latest release?
Roosted7 commented on 2019-05-26 18:15 (UTC)
Thanks for your work Wedjat! I've enjoyed the package and I'll try and keep it up to date :)
wedjat commented on 2019-05-26 10:13 (UTC)
I've switched to a different topic and that I will no longer work with MRI neuroimaging data, so I disown package, because I don't have enough time to maintain it regularly.