Search Criteria
Package Details: ddate 0.2.2-3
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ddate.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ddate |
Description: | PERPETUAL DATE CONVERTER FROM GREGORIAN TO POEE CALENDAR |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/bo0ts/ddate |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | bo0ts |
Maintainer: | Arvedui |
Last Packager: | Arvedui |
Votes: | 70 |
Popularity: | 0.006174 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-30 17:31 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2019-01-28 20:17 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
escondida commented on 2020-04-13 00:34 (UTC)
Fair enough!
Arvedui commented on 2020-04-10 16:05 (UTC)
I think it is absolutely awesome that someone fixes some of the long standing issues with ddate and I'm definitely interested. But I'm a little hesitant to switch to a version that is not a drop in replacement.
Especially that I will not notified with a crash of ddate on St. Tib's Day with your version is a really a problem for me.
Also problematic are the differing cli arguments (date order) and and differing format parameters.
escondida commented on 2020-04-07 19:16 (UTC) (edited on 2020-04-07 19:37 (UTC) by escondida)
If you're interested, I've created an updated fork that
Also, if you're interested, here's an example PKGBUILD for it (-:
Arvedui commented on 2019-01-28 20:17 (UTC)
That is interesting, I mean it must have worked at some point …
Anyway, thanks for reporting.
decadentsoup commented on 2019-01-28 06:56 (UTC)
When I ran makepkg, I got the message "CMake Error: No source or binary directory provided" -- a "." to the end of the cmake command in the PKGBUILD fixed it for me (i.e. "cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .").
Thanks for the package, by the way! This is one of those commands I forget about regularly but always miss when I remember it.
Arvedui commented on 2018-04-08 13:30 (UTC)
As I said having ddate back in the official repos would be great! No objections from me.
escondida commented on 2018-04-04 20:52 (UTC)
Forgive me for the confusion; the package would still be ddate. The "fnord" just snuck in, as they are wont to do.
Arvedui commented on 2018-03-31 11:39 (UTC)
You are planning to create a package called fnord in [community]? Have I understood that correctly?
If Yes: I would be thrilled if ddate would find it's way back into the official repos, however I do worry that it might be hard to find in a package called fnord.
escondida commented on 2018-03-28 20:25 (UTC)
Arvedui, as current maintainer, would you object if I were to assimilate ddate into fnord [community]?
Arvedui commented on 2017-12-11 19:30 (UTC)
Sure :)
1 2 3 Next › Last »