Package Details: deepgit 4.4-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: deepgit
Description: A tool to investigate the history of source code.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom
Submitter: Psykar
Maintainer: ewirch
Last Packager: ewirch
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-12-08 01:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-07 11:32 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

ewirch commented on 2024-03-07 11:34 (UTC)

Thanks. I should really get used to clean the build directory before testing it locally. Too bad makepkg doesn't prevent this easy mistake automatically.


BluePeril commented on 2024-03-07 08:27 (UTC)

Could you please known-issues.txt. It is not available anymore.

Psykar commented on 2019-02-19 21:50 (UTC)

I haven't used this in a few years - so if someone wants to grab it, go for it!

Psykar commented on 2017-10-16 00:06 (UTC)

Version bumped. Thanks for the report.

Psykar commented on 2017-01-30 00:52 (UTC)

Updated java dependency. You're entirely correct that it only needs the runtime!

jjacky commented on 2017-01-29 17:08 (UTC)

Dependency java-environment is wrong, java-runtime is enough. As it says on the wiki, jdk is needed when compilation is required, to simply run java software, as is the case here, jre is all that's needed. Thanks for the package.

Psykar commented on 2017-01-12 03:22 (UTC)

symbal - the link you provided appears to be for people packaging alternate JVMs, not for packages that run using existing JVMs. I followed the guidelines here for packaging this (they were a pain) If specific changes are required, let me know - currently it's started using a custom script which launches using /usr/bin/java (which is what the archlinux-java script replaces), hacked down from the provided one in the tarball provided by Syntevo (see )

symbal commented on 2017-01-12 03:14 (UTC)

Please could modify this package so that it conforms to the way Arch handles Java as shown at the following link? This didn't work when using Java 7 but, worked no problem with version 8.

Psykar commented on 2017-01-01 22:43 (UTC)

Done, sorry for the delay!

stevenbenner commented on 2016-12-23 20:42 (UTC)

Minor request: Could you use https urls for the sources (.SRCINFO and PKGBUILD)?