Search Criteria
Package Details: djgpp-djcrx 2.05-12
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/djgpp-djcrx.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | djgpp-djcrx |
Description: | Headers and utilities for the djgpp cross-compiler |
Upstream URL: | http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/ |
Keywords: | build cross djgpp DOS headers libc |
Licenses: | GPL, LGPL, custom:djgpp |
Conflicts: | djgpp-djcrx-bootstrap |
Submitter: | felix.s |
Maintainer: | andris |
Last Packager: | andris |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 0.001210 |
First Submitted: | 2015-09-06 19:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-08-06 15:30 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- djgpp-binutilsAUR (make)
- djgpp-gccAUR (make)
Required by (7)
- comcom-common-git (make)
- comcom32-git (make)
- comcom64-git (make)
- djgpp-gcc
- djgpp-gcc (optional)
- djgpp-pkg-config
- djgpp-zlib
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
joshdevga commented on 2023-10-22 05:56 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for maintaining.
I ran into a bug in open.c that turns out to already have an upstream fix. The issue causes open() to sometimes set the incorrect value for the readonly attribute on new files. Applying the upstream change fixed the issue.
Here is the patch I applied:
For reference, here is a link to the change history from delorie.com:
https://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/src/libc/posix/fcntl/open.c
The fix is spread across two commits (1.18 and 1.19)
Would you mind applying the patch to this package? I'm happy to supply a full patch (including PKGBUILD changes) if it would be helpful.
Thanks again
dreieck commented on 2023-07-24 13:46 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-24 13:52 (UTC) by dreieck)
In the
build()
function, at the beginning you need to addand apply the following ↗ patch:
otherwise
build()
fails with↗ Upstream issue report was not possible, it refuses with "Due to abuse, the bug database is not currently accepting changes.". I have reported the issue upstream via ↗ email.
Regards & thanks for maintaining!
tranqtech commented on 2023-02-12 15:26 (UTC)
@Hatsum Thank you. I made a rookie mistake when I first tried adding your patch, but after figuring out my error it worked a real treat.
Hatsum commented on 2023-01-29 23:06 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-29 23:07 (UTC) by Hatsum)
I cloned the Git repository of this package.
Then, I edited the file
PKGBUILD
as follows:- I added
gcc-12.patch
(the name of my patch) to thesource
attribute,- I added the sha256 checksum of the patch to
sha256sums
,- And I added at the end of the
prepare
step:Finally, I used
makepkg
to build the package with my patch.epoch32 commented on 2023-01-23 08:46 (UTC)
@Hatsum
how did you apply the patch?
Hatsum commented on 2023-01-14 14:06 (UTC)
I can't build this package with djgpp-gcc 12.2.0-2 because gcc returns several errors as explained in https://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2022/05/15/11:30:49 .
I made the following patch to successfully build the package:
This patch only ignore errors returned by gcc but does not fix them :(
JL2210 commented on 2020-05-19 20:47 (UTC)
delorie.com copy of files is down. http://na.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/djgpp/current is reliable
ron2138 commented on 2019-03-16 17:58 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-16 23:57 (UTC) by ron2138)
(1) Package doesn't built:
Using djgpp-djcrx-bootstrap, but I see no other option.
Edit: djgpp-djcrx-cvs doesn't fail in that way.
(2) Shouldn't this package also
?
1 2 Next › Last »