Package Details: dooit 3.3.4-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/dooit.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: dooit
Description: A TUI Todo Manager
Upstream URL: https://github.com/dooit-org/dooit
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: kraanzu
Maintainer: kraanzu (jaxvanyang)
Last Packager: jaxvanyang
Votes: 1
Popularity: 0.001933
First Submitted: 2023-10-19 04:59 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-04 03:09 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

jaxvanyang commented on 2025-12-04 03:10 (UTC)

@equate9918 Thank you! It's fixed now.

equate9918 commented on 2025-12-03 06:56 (UTC)

Required for 3.3.4

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 2db8d7f..2101779 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ makedepends=(
     'python-installer'
     'python-wheel'
     'python-poetry-core>=1.0.0'
+    'python-hatchling'
 )
 source=("$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::${url}/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz")
 sha256sums=('a14dea1a297be88dd92735023c630ee61f62ce31a89cb951b0bcad519ad586b6')

loacker commented on 2024-09-30 07:21 (UTC)

Yes I can confirm that is fixed. Thank you!

kraanzu commented on 2024-09-30 06:24 (UTC)

Hi @jaxvanyang, My bad. Thanks for fixing it

jaxvanyang commented on 2024-09-30 01:10 (UTC)

@loacker Thanks for the report. It should be fixed now.

loacker commented on 2024-09-29 10:18 (UTC)

The package is missing the sha256sum for the file LICENSE and fail to build. Please update the package including the correct hash.

Thank you!

$ diff PKGBUILD.old PKGBUILD.new 
18c18,19
< sha256sums=('2c078bd844d3b4b1b2ca56d894d739baa0aad5fa809246ec25ee932fd2b8e029')
---
> sha256sums=('2c078bd844d3b4b1b2ca56d894d739baa0aad5fa809246ec25ee932fd2b8e029'
>             '33504ada23da37774e0d02d99a3a61328f3df017a2bf8468525cd30bb86f57ec')

jaxvanyang commented on 2024-04-02 05:19 (UTC)

@kraanzu

Do you mean, we fix the tzlocal problem you mentioned and create both source and -bin packages???

Yes, or we can simply keep providing binary in the dooit package as it doesn't break anything.

kraanzu commented on 2024-04-02 02:58 (UTC)

Hi @jaxvanyang

But I think the better way is fixing the dependency problem, and provide both source and binary package. What do you think?

Do you mean, we fix the tzlocal problem you mentioned and create both source and -bin packages???

jaxvanyang commented on 2024-04-02 01:14 (UTC)

@kraanzu

AUR submission guidelines - ArchWiki says:

Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix.

Oh no, I might get it wrong. I thought it was when the source package are available. My bad.

But I think the better way is fixing the dependency problem, and provide both source and binary package. What do you think?

kraanzu commented on 2024-04-01 11:20 (UTC)

Hi @jaxvanyang

I see it merged! Thanks :) Shouldn't we use -bin instead of a regular name then tho?

1 2 Next › Last »