Package Details: duplicati-latest 2.0.3.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/duplicati-latest.git (read-only)
Package Base: duplicati-latest
Description: A free backup client that securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers
Upstream URL: http://duplicati.com
Keywords: backup duplicati
Licenses: LGPL
Submitter: dannysu
Maintainer: valandil (carbolymer)
Last Packager: valandil
Votes: 31
Popularity: 0.132353
First Submitted: 2014-09-01 02:11
Last Updated: 2018-09-05 14:37

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

valandil commented on 2018-08-31 15:30

I don't have a NAS to test. Could you make sure that the latest version runs properly? If it does, I'll add it to the package. Thanks!

ganthore commented on 2018-08-31 15:00

Since this software is advertised to work on NAS storage devices, please consider adding armv7h to the PKGBUILD. I tested on a local box and the software appears to run:

https://github.com/ganthore/arch-duplicati-latest/blob/master/PKGBUILD#L24

valandil commented on 2018-06-29 17:40

And the package is now up to date.

warwickmm commented on 2018-06-29 03:46

The issue with files not being removed from the tmp directory should be fixed in version 2.0.3.8.

valandil commented on 2018-06-21 09:25

Thanks for the info!

marcelhuber commented on 2018-06-21 07:05

The issue @warwickmm mentioned still applies to duplicati 2.0.3.7_canary, so be patient and wait for the next release and use 2.0.3.5 in the meantime.

warwickmm commented on 2018-06-10 04:29

Users commenting on the following issue seem to be experiencing similar symptoms with the growing tmp directory:

https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/3206

2.0.3.6 involved a big rewrite to allow for concurrent processing. It seems that this has introduced a few issues, so it's recommended that users downgrade to an earlier version for critical backups.

jono commented on 2018-06-06 20:59

Yes, I added a comment to an existing ticket upstream which is still open: https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/2465#issuecomment-390861552

What is the policy for this in the AUR then? Should this package be downgraded here?

algebro commented on 2018-06-05 20:02

Thanks, I've downgraded to 2.0.3.5-2 and I'll report the results after a few days.

valandil commented on 2018-06-05 08:57

I still haven't seen this issue, and since this is an upstream issue, I recommend downgrading momentarily, and waiting for a fix.