Search Criteria
Package Details: eclipse-clp 7.0.63-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/eclipse-clp.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | eclipse-clp |
Description: | Constraint Logic Programming System |
Upstream URL: | http://eclipseclp.org/ |
Keywords: | clp prolog |
Licenses: | CMPL 1.1 |
Submitter: | aarroyoc |
Maintainer: | None |
Last Packager: | aarroyoc |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2022-01-31 16:15 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-10 13:48 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- tk (tk-fossilAUR)
- java-runtime (jre10AUR, jre12AUR, jdk10AUR, jdk10-openj9-binAUR, jdk7AUR, jre7AUR, amazon-corretto-16AUR, jdk8-graalvm-binAUR, jdk16-graalvm-binAUR, jdk16-adoptopenjdkAUR, liberica-jre-11-binAUR, jdk11-j9-binAUR, jre11-jbr-xdgAUR, jre16-openjdkAUR, jre14-openjdkAUR, jre15AUR, jre14AUR, jre13AUR, jre16AUR, jre18-openjdkAUR, amazon-corretto-19-binAUR, jdk19-graalvm-binAUR, liberica-jre-11-full-binAUR, jdk19-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk13-openjdk-binAUR, liberica-jre-8-full-binAUR, jdk11-graalvm-binAUR, jre-openj9AUR, jdk11-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jre12-openjdkAUR, jdk11-dragonwell-standard-binAUR, jdk11-jetbrains-binAUR, jdk20-graalvm-binAUR, jdk17-graalvm-binAUR, jdk8-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk20-openj9-binAUR, zulu-13-binAUR, jdk8-dragonwell-extended-binAUR, jdk8-dragonwell-standard-binAUR, jdk11-dragonwell-extended-binAUR, jdk17-dragonwell-standard-binAUR, jre11AUR, jdk8-j9-binAUR, jdk7-j9-binAUR, jdk7r1-j9-binAUR, jdk8-dragonwell-extendedAUR, jre13-openjdkAUR, jre15-openjdkAUR, jdk21-graalvm-binAUR, jre17-jetbrainsAUR, jdk8-openj9-binAUR, jre-ltsAUR, microsoft-openjdk-11-binAUR, microsoft-openjdk-17-binAUR, microsoft-openjdk-21-binAUR, liberica-nik-24-full-binAUR, jre21-jetbrains-gitAUR, jdk21-jetbrains-gitAUR, zulu-17-binAUR, zulu-11-binAUR, zulu-8-binAUR, mandrel-binAUR, mandrel24-binAUR, liberica-jdk-17-full-binAUR, liberica-jdk-11-lite-binAUR, liberica-jdk-11-full-binAUR, liberica-jdk-11-binAUR, jdk17-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk21-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk22-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk20-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jdk22-graalvm-binAUR, jre19-openjdkAUR, jdk17-jetbrains-binAUR, zulu-jdk-fx-binAUR, jre21-jetbrainsAUR, jdk17-zulu-prime-binAUR, zing-21-binAUR, zing-8-binAUR, jdk23-graalvm-ee-binAUR, jre17AUR, java-openjdk-binAUR, amazon-corretto-17AUR, amazon-corretto-21-binAUR, jdk21-temurinAUR, amazon-corretto-8AUR, amazon-corretto-11AUR, jdk11-temurinAUR, liberica-jdk-full-binAUR, liberica-jdk-21-full-binAUR, liberica-jdk-8-full-binAUR, jdk17-temurinAUR, jdk8-temurinAUR, zulu-21-binAUR, jdk-temurinAUR, jre8AUR, jdk8AUR, zulu-17-fx-binAUR, jdk8-perfAUR, zulu-jre-fx-binAUR, zulu-fx-binAUR, zulu8-fx-binAUR, zulu11-fx-binAUR, zulu17-fx-binAUR, zulu21-fx-binAUR, jdk-openj9-binAUR, jdk11-openj9-binAUR, jre-jetbrainsAUR, jre-openjdk-wakefieldAUR, jdk-openjdk-wakefieldAUR, jdk21-openj9-binAUR, zulu-23-binAUR, jreAUR, jdkAUR, jdk21-jetbrains-binAUR, jre-zulu-binAUR, jre-zulu-fx-binAUR, jdk21-dragonwell-standard-binAUR, jdk21-dragonwell-extended-binAUR, jdk-android-studioAUR, jdk17-openj9-binAUR, java-openjdk-ea-binAUR, jre-zuluAUR, jre-zulu-fxAUR, jre21-zulu-binAUR, jre17-zulu-binAUR, jdk-openjdk, jdk11-openjdk, jdk17-openjdk, jdk21-openjdk, jre-openjdk, jre11-openjdk, jre17-openjdk, jre21-openjdk, jre8-openjdk) (optional) – jvm support
- rlwrap (optional) – readline support
Required by (1)
- prologs (optional)
Latest Comments
jeshan commented on 2023-08-15 16:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-15 16:51 (UTC) by jeshan)
beta version confirmed when running on the terminal:
jeshan commented on 2023-08-15 16:49 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-15 16:49 (UTC) by jeshan)
I see the old checksum on my local PKGBUILD :(
Is that an issue on my side?
jeshan commented on 2023-08-15 16:43 (UTC)
did you try deploying a fix? I still see the same issue. I ran the sha256sum on the file downloaded here: https://eclipseclp.org/Distribution/CurrentRelease/7.1_13%20x86_64_linux%20Intel-64bit-Linux/eclipse_basic.tgz
and got: b52e305b01d09be825cb639aeee005f7e9812f0b67dae6bf1d1bd623863bc0a6 which is strangely already what we expect.
But more importantly, I maintain that since 7.1.x wasn't announced (AFAIK and on the home page), then we should remain on 7.0.x
aarroyoc commented on 2023-08-11 15:57 (UTC)
It seems like the package was updated (but the Last Modified Date on the server reports it wasn't). I updated the package to 7.1.13 because it was flagged out of date.
jeshan commented on 2023-08-11 14:40 (UTC)
last update broke for me:
By the way, I believe that version 7.1 is not a stable release yet (no news of it on the home page).