Search Criteria
Package Details: edfbrowser 2.03-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/edfbrowser.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | edfbrowser |
Description: | A free, opensource, multiplatform, universal viewer and toolbox intended for, but not limited to, timeseries storage files like EEG, EMG, ECG, BioImpedance, etc. |
Upstream URL: | http://www.teuniz.net/edfbrowser/ |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | cbrnr |
Maintainer: | cbrnr |
Last Packager: | cbrnr |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.53 |
First Submitted: | 2016-07-21 11:40 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-05-03 07:13 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
ksnw commented on 2023-02-22 20:01 (UTC)
All good. Thanks for digging.
cbrnr commented on 2023-02-21 18:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-22 09:07 (UTC) by cbrnr)
Apparently this has already been reported and fixed: https://gitlab.com/Teuniz/EDFbrowser/-/merge_requests/6
So we need to wait for the next release I guess. If you don't want to wait, you can modify your
~/.makepkg.conf
and remove the offending flag (https://man.archlinux.org/man/makepkg.conf.5).cbrnr commented on 2023-02-21 16:55 (UTC)
Maybe I changed my
/etc/makepkg.conf
at some point, because this flag seems to be a relatively new default (see e.g. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0003-buildflags.rst#specification). If that's the case then this needs to be fixed upstream. Can you report it and link the issue here?ksnw commented on 2023-02-21 16:34 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-21 16:48 (UTC) by ksnw)
To be safe, I removed
/etc/makepkg.conf
and reinstalled pacman, same error.Inside
/etc/makepkg.conf
, the CFLAGS is set asCFLAGS="-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -fexceptions \ -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Werror=format-security \ -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection"
meaning
pacman
turned on-Werror=format-security
by default. I tried locally - turning this off does remove the compilation error. Did you turn it off manually?cbrnr commented on 2023-02-21 07:07 (UTC)
My
gcc
flags are identical. Maybe you changed something in/etc/makepkg.conf
?ksnw commented on 2023-02-20 15:02 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-20 15:05 (UTC) by ksnw)
Interesting. I don't think I tweaked any gcc setups, at least not intentionally. here is my
gcc -v
dump,Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.2.1/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++,d --enable-bootstrap --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/ --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.2.1 20230201 (GCC)
cbrnr commented on 2023-02-20 14:49 (UTC)
That's really strange. I have exactly the same versions as you. And yes, my system is also completely up to date.
Did you set any additional compiler options by any chance? It looks like you set
-Werror=format-security
, which is not enabled by default.ksnw commented on 2023-02-20 14:43 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-20 14:44 (UTC) by ksnw)
ok... thanks anyways.
I updated with
pacman -Syu
without errors, and I assume you did the same. I also installed thebase-devel
, which was recently converted to meta from group. How is it possible that we are different versions of any dependency libraries?Anyways, my systems is on gcc/gcc-libs 12.2.1-2, and glibc 2.37-2.
Does anybody else have compilation errors?
cbrnr commented on 2023-02-20 08:24 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this issue. Compiling (and installing the package) works fine. Maybe check your system for outdated packages (such as
gcc
andglibc
)? I'm sorry I cannot help more.ksnw commented on 2023-02-18 18:28 (UTC)
@cbrnr it's the compile stage.
makepkg -s
gives me that error.1 2 Next › Last »