Package Details: eigen3 3.4.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/eigen3.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: eigen3
Description: Lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math, a.k.a. linear algebra
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.com/libeigen/eigen
Licenses: Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, MPL-2.0, Minpack, LGPL-2.1-only OR LGPL-2.1-or-later
Submitter: FabioLolix
Maintainer: FabioLolix
Last Packager: FabioLolix
Votes: 3
Popularity: 1.39
First Submitted: 2025-09-24 21:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-10-03 10:08 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

FabioLolix commented on 2025-10-03 10:10 (UTC)

This pkgbuild is maintained at https://github.com/FabioLolix/PKGBUILD-AUR_fix

Latest Comments

a821 commented on 2025-10-27 19:40 (UTC)

OK. In any case, this package needs to be deleted (or perhaps merged into a new one with another name) anyway, because name conflicts are not allowed. AFAIK, you are even blocked from pushing by the aurweb.

FabioLolix commented on 2025-10-27 19:29 (UTC)

Thanks for notify me, the one in Extra install in /usr and can't be co-installed with eigen, this one install in /opt/eigen3, packages like itk (InsightToolKit) automatically get the correct version with both installed

Likely I'll reupload with a different name

Also spotted 2 minor mistake in this pkgbuild only now

a821 commented on 2025-10-27 18:33 (UTC)

In extra: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/eigen3/

JPenuchot commented on 2025-10-04 07:55 (UTC)

Perfect, thanks for the update :)

FabioLolix commented on 2025-10-03 10:10 (UTC)

This pkgbuild is maintained at https://github.com/FabioLolix/PKGBUILD-AUR_fix

FabioLolix commented on 2025-10-03 10:09 (UTC)

Hi, upstream deleted and recreated the tag

greyltc commented on 2025-10-03 09:17 (UTC)

When I fetch the source, https://gitlab.com/libeigen/eigen/-/archive/3.4.1/eigen-3.4.1.tar.gz, I get a blob with sha256sum = b93c667d1b69265cdb4d9f30ec21f8facbbe8b307cf34c0b9942834c6d4fdbe2

Is that the right one?

JPenuchot commented on 2025-10-01 09:36 (UTC)

Hi,

The main source archive doesn't pass the validity check.

Regards, Jules