Package Details: eminent-git 2016.06.15.g42ee276-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/eminent-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: eminent-git
Description: Effortless wmii-style dynamic tagging for the awesome window manager version 3.5 or later, second iteration
Upstream URL: https://github.com/guotsuan/eminent
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: eminent
Provides: eminent
Submitter: None
Maintainer: guotsuan
Last Packager: guotsuan
Votes: 65
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2008-05-30 12:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-04-23 00:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

guotsuan commented on 2022-04-23 00:16 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminding. The PKGBUILD has been updated

ecognito commented on 2022-04-21 03:31 (UTC)

Please update source URL to git+https://github.com/guotsuan/eminent.git

Ref: https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/

guotsuan commented on 2016-03-02 11:07 (UTC) (edited on 2016-03-02 11:27 (UTC) by guotsuan)

It occured to me that replacing the filter from "awful.widget.taglist.filter.all" to "awful.widget.taglist.filter.noempty" cannot fully replicate eminent. In previous eminent, when you call the function tag.viewprev or tag.viewnext to vist a previous or next tag. You will only jump backward or forward among the *non-empty* tags. But replacing the filter cannot change the behavior of tag.viewprev or tag.viewnext. Therefore now you will jump backward or forward the next tag no matter if it is empty or not.

guotsuan commented on 2016-02-23 16:59 (UTC)

I see no point to update the package for the awesome 3.5 or later. For awesome 3.5 or later, just like @kerny suggested, replace: mytaglist[s] = awful.widget.taglist(s, awful.widget.taglist.filter.all, mytaglist.buttons) in rc.lua with: mytaglist[s] = awful.widget.taglist(s, awful.widget.taglist.filter.noempty, mytaglist.buttons) Your awesome will have the same behaviour as eminent

guotsuan commented on 2015-01-11 06:49 (UTC)

@kerny, I think you are right. I have tested your code. It works without any problem. I guess you may also want to update the also wiki too, if you want.

kerny commented on 2015-01-05 18:36 (UTC)

I found out that you can have the same behavior as eminent with your default awesome installation. Just change filter from all to noempty in taglist creation in your rc.lua configuration. from this: mytaglist[s] = awful.widget.taglist(s, awful.widget.taglist.filter.all, mytaglist.buttons) to this: mytaglist[s] = awful.widget.taglist(s, awful.widget.taglist.filter.noempty, mytaglist.buttons)

guotsuan commented on 2014-10-23 17:03 (UTC)

The original Upstream URL is no longer available. Therefore in the package Upstream was set to the github source. Also added an option not to create a new tag if it's blank. Please check github source for details.

guotsuan commented on 2014-03-20 18:26 (UTC)

fixed a small bug and update the pkgvers()

guotsuan commented on 2013-10-30 16:18 (UTC)

Thanks @kerny for the correction. I have corrected and updated the package.

kerny commented on 2013-10-30 16:04 (UTC)

There is bug on line 77 -- local s = screen and screen.index or capi.mouse.screen ++ local s = screen or capi.mouse.screen

stativ commented on 2013-08-10 08:10 (UTC)

eminent-awesome-3.5-git has been merged into eminent-git.

guotsuan commented on 2013-04-10 09:44 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminding. I have updated PKGBUILD and also change function pkgver() to a better expression.

gtmanfred commented on 2013-04-10 04:28 (UTC)

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines pacman 4.1 supports git in source=()

guotsuan commented on 2013-04-09 18:14 (UTC)

previous eminent was modified for awesome 3.5 or awesome-git.

post-factum commented on 2013-01-04 00:17 (UTC)

Fails to work with awesome 3.5: === /usr/share/awesome/lib/eminent.lua:44: attempt to index field 'label' (a nil value) === It's known issue (https://github.com/GGLucas/eminent/issues/1) with temporary fix.

commented on 2010-10-06 12:00 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. Used it for debugging at some point and forgot to remove it. I've removed and committed it.

jackoneill commented on 2010-10-06 11:47 (UTC)

Why does eminent require naughty? As far as I can tell, eminent doesn't actually use naughty.