Search Criteria
Package Details: eprover 3.2-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/eprover.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | eprover |
| Description: | E is theorem prover for full first-order logic with equality. |
| Upstream URL: | http://wwwlehre.dhbw-stuttgart.de/~sschulz/E/E.html |
| Licenses: | GPL2 |
| Submitter: | asch |
| Maintainer: | asch |
| Last Packager: | asch |
| Votes: | 11 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-21 23:43 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-12-29 10:16 (UTC) |
Dependencies (0)
Required by (4)
- hets-desktop (optional)
- hets-desktop-bin (optional)
- hets-server (optional)
- hets-server-bin (optional)
Latest Comments
skylee commented on 2025-12-27 17:07 (UTC)
Current upstream version is 3.2 already.
jachymb commented on 2024-08-14 10:43 (UTC)
Huh, weird. I confirm the curl produces what you say to me also. But it wouldn't build and the other checksum is what I got using makepkg -g
asch commented on 2024-08-13 15:08 (UTC)
It looks correct to me:
Don't you have the source archive (E.tgz) cached somewhere so you are actually installing old version?
jachymb commented on 2024-08-13 14:28 (UTC)
I can't build, fails on checksums
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... E.tgz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
I think the checksum should be
sha256sums=('8a53dfb7276c10794c3ce98527cfcf977939769e7a5e6dc2eda9b38be3fc404a')
instead of
sha256sums=('f84db3ec902488d5e166b5915c56e12397fd3660744387a2c5a6f81a5005a986')
jachymb commented on 2024-07-22 21:54 (UTC)
Current upstream version is 3.1 already
jachymb commented on 2021-02-08 12:57 (UTC)
Ah, I was still experiencing it due to yay having cashed the previous version with the error. You should probably increment the $pkgrel when doing changes like fixing a wrong hash.
asch commented on 2021-02-01 09:38 (UTC)
@jachymb: This problem was fixed on Jan 28th.
jachymb commented on 2021-02-01 09:24 (UTC)
I does not build: "ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!"
mdl commented on 2021-01-28 21:13 (UTC)
@asch you forgot to update the hash in the PKGBUILD