Search Criteria
Package Details: expac-git 9.2.g6be7fe1-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/expac-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | expac-git |
Description: | pacman database extraction utility |
Upstream URL: | http://github.com/falconindy/expac |
Licenses: | |
Conflicts: | |
Provides: | |
Submitter: | falconindy |
Maintainer: | None |
Last Packager: | falconindy |
Votes: | 37 |
Popularity: | 0.000002 |
First Submitted: | 2010-12-01 00:58 |
Last Updated: | 2019-06-09 00:56 |
Dependencies (4)
Required by (16)
- apw-git (requires expac)
- aurman (requires expac)
- auru-git (requires expac)
- cylon (requires expac)
- deepin-qt5platform-plugins-git (requires expac) (make)
- franz (requires expac) (make)
- march-overlay-git (requires expac)
- pac-util (requires expac)
- pac-util-git (requires expac)
- pacaur (requires expac)
- pacaur-git (requires expac)
- packy (requires expac)
- pacmerge (requires expac)
- picker (requires expac)
- pkgbuild-watch (requires expac)
- remakepkg (requires expac)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
wuxb commented on 2018-06-21 03:56
aur/expac-git 8.1.g5ae006f-1 -> 3.9.g7a73405-1
It seems the history has been totally erased?
cryzed commented on 2018-06-18 12:17
@p90 https://github.com/polygamma/aurman#ignore-missing-or-incomplete-arch-fields-in-the-build-script-passing--a-to-makepkg-during-package-building
languitar commented on 2018-06-17 12:35
armv6h also works well
p90 commented on 2018-06-14 16:47
Can you elaborate on the ignore-arch option? Have the same problem but cannot find any documentation on what to do about it. Alternativly, can we just get armv7h added?
cryzed commented on 2018-06-13 19:42
Could you add "armv7h" to the arch array? It compiles fine. I'm using this indirectly on my Raspberry Pi through aurman.
EDIT: Maybe not necessary, using aurman/makepkg's ignore-arch option works.
Earnest commented on 2013-05-06 21:07
Building with default makepkg CFLAGS (including -pedantic and -Werror) produces the following build warning (warnings treated as errors):
expac.c: In function ‘format_optdep’:
expac.c:143:11: error: ignoring return value of ‘asprintf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
asprintf(&out, "%s: %s", optdep->name, optdep->desc);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [expac] Error 1
falconindy commented on 2012-03-08 20:31
yep, its a bug. fixed.
karol_007 commented on 2012-03-08 19:55
'expac "%n %P" -Q' spits some garbage (weird characters) along with the info I requested:
...
xvidcore
xz ؚ Õ
youtube-dl
zathura
zlib
[karol@black ~]$ ?1;2c^[[?1;2c^[[?1;2c
or e.g.
...
xvidcore
xz * Ø* +%
youtube-dl
zathura
zlib
[karol@black ~]$ ?1;2c^[[?1;2c^[[?1;2c
As you can see, the garbage characters change from one run to another. The errors are present also for other packages, the above is just an example. perl is super-weird (it has a ton of provides):
perl p33ø>°0 È3à3l@i 4848ôò p44··U À4Ø4à/87 5(5Á ^ `5x5JmÞ °5È5©= H6X6¯u[ 6 6\ Ø6è6:æú 707' ½ h77ÁBÝ6 À7à7}âà 808B¡ h8x8ÊL °8È8ºBí® P9h9Ò-:- 9À9B"mú ø9:fÖ H:`:-é¼ :°:.4u è: 8;X;¦[
; ;<D¼ Ø;ð;ÓÞS@ (<@<=LC x<<BÊØ À<Ø<%D = =ÍÐp X=x=ô °=À=ï)¾ ø=>0) H>h>Yvb >À>,ÁHm ø>?£ÜnÁ P?p?¼åU9 ¨?È?÷5 X@x@O҃ °@È@óW® PAhA©£¨ A¸Ag(°d ðBÉ6_ @B`BSç B°B®遍 èB 8CPCÕ"lÛ C C ØCèC;éþh D0DDéþh hDD«¤Û~ ¸DÐDþ1¯ E E$
C XEpEØ6ò~ ¨EÀEgX® øF'sÁ @FPFֺe F F±iô, ØFøFÐF*å 0GPGOý¸× G Gà`N» ØGøG?½} 0HHHÖf´ H HHl ØHðH,ï" (I@I©Qí xII܉$ ÈIàIj¶? J0Jkk#? hJJ` ÀJØJ©+öÝ K8Kâ pKKh ÀKàKråÁ. L8LPÌt pLL yê_ ÀLÐLñċ M(MwDPÊ `MMêù۟ ¸MÐMßïS= NNhʻ¦ PNpN@ÂÈÅ ¨NÀN~Øq øNO¾[%) HOhO¬ûp O¸O섚ä ðPÌΓ5 @PXP¡ P¨P£DËÖ àPøP¸wtx 0QHQÜï0 QQ+ï[r ÈQèQf R8R½õ~9 pRR½¦Ý ÀRÐRrY S S¼øC> XSpSõ+} ¨SÀSH¦ øST¯ÉÐ HT`T<^A T°Tí°¦: èT 8UHU0è¢ UU3Ø6 ÐUèUïj V8V¤֘Ì pVVªNt ÀVàVC W0W>g¯ hWW76O ¸WÐW$
SÖn X(X?º· `XxXKe
À °XÈXg»äÿ PYhY¦£ïÝ Y¸Y½\Ó ðZ©Óvò @ZXZ¬ýë Z°ZX
è[Q£ @[X[º6¹ [°[=- è[ø[}Mq 0\H\Lþ= \\_
Did I do something wrong? Can you reproduce it (I'm on 32-bit Arch)? If you want the full output, tell me how you should I sent it to you - e-mail?
karol_007 commented on 2012-01-31 20:31
Is there a way to tell expac to use another config file, instead of pacman.conf?
karol_007 commented on 2012-01-31 14:30
I see that different flags behave in different ways e.g.
%l install date (only with -Q)
doesn't return anything with '-S', but
%k download size (only with -S)
shows 0.00 KiB for every package when called with '-Q'.
I'm not sure if it's worth messing with the code, I think adding '(only with -Q)' to the man page is enough.
Thanks :-)