Package Details: flashplayer-standalone 32.0.0.387-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/flashplayer-standalone.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: flashplayer-standalone
Description: Adobe Flash Player Standalone (A.K.A. Adobe Flash Player Projector)
Upstream URL: http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html
Licenses: LGPL, custom:Adobe
Submitter: ly50247
Maintainer: frealgagu (Omar007)
Last Packager: frealgagu
Votes: 160
Popularity: 2.54
First Submitted: 2010-06-21 06:25
Last Updated: 2020-06-09 20:22

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

SirWuffleton commented on 2012-06-30 01:28

Just wondering, does anyone know where I can find a copy of the final x86_64 archive? I'd prefer to keep running my outdated native x64 version if possible, since a 41 package dependency chain to run one program is pretty ridiculous. Thanks!

beej commented on 2012-06-25 16:03

I have to agree with josephgbr. It's strange that I have a package on my system, bin32-flashplayer-standalone, that does not exist in the official repo or in AUR.

rafaelff commented on 2012-06-20 06:02

IMO the pkgname should simple be flashplayer-standalone, not bin32 in front of it for 64bit systems.

beej commented on 2012-06-15 20:40

Installing bin32-flashplayer-standalone when the AUR package is called flashplayer-standalone is harshing my build scripts, and my out-of-date-check scripts. I'll code around it, but I don't know if putting regular and bin32 in the same AUR script is the best thing.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-09 04:55

@nikolardo: on x86_64, enable the multilib repository

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-08 17:51

Flagged out of date b.c. checksum of flashplayer_11_sa.i386.tar.gz fails.

nikolardo commented on 2012-06-07 23:50

Dependency `lib32-gtk2' of `flashplayer-standalone' does not exist.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-06 19:19

Package updated so that the 32bit version is used on x86_64.
Please report any problem you might have with the new bin32- split package on x86_64.

Synthead commented on 2012-06-04 05:43

404 on download link

edoardo commented on 2012-06-02 13:02

jimireynold2nd is right, it seems dead to me too.