Package Details: focuswriter 1.6.15-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: focuswriter
Description: A simple fullscreen word processor
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: gottcode
Maintainer: gottcode
Last Packager: gottcode
Votes: 117
Popularity: 0.737544
First Submitted: 2008-10-24 02:21
Last Updated: 2018-07-20 21:57

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

gottcode commented on 2018-07-13 21:57

@8BitSloth I'm not sure what you mean as this package doesn't require qt5-tools-git. It makedepends on qt5-tools only.

8BitSloth commented on 2018-07-13 19:20

If anyone is having issues with this package requiring qt5-tools-git and being unable or unwilling to install it, install qt5-tools from the official repo before installing this.

gottcode commented on 2018-07-08 18:44

@apastuszak The sha256sum should be fixed now. Thanks for letting me know.

apastuszak commented on 2018-07-08 18:06

Getting the following error when I try and install:

==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

pavelC commented on 2018-03-08 04:02

@gottcode thanks for the feedback. I was able to get it installed.

gottcode commented on 2018-03-07 16:53

@pavelC I don't see any warning messages in that screenshot. The text -DQT_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS is just a flag passed during compile to enable warnings, and not a warning itself.

pavelC commented on 2018-03-07 16:25

@gottcode Thanks for the quick response! I'm using Qt5.10.1-2 and g++ 7.3.0. Here's an image of where the warnings start:

update: I ran it again. Even with the warnings, I did get the package built and installed.

gottcode commented on 2018-03-07 10:47

@pavelC That's strange, I don't get any. Do you have the latest Qt? What compiler are you using? I just built the package with Qt 5.10.1 and both g++ 7.3.0 and clang++ 5.0.1, and there are no warnings for me.

pavelC commented on 2018-03-07 02:27

When building the package, there are a lot of DQT_DEPRICATED_WARNINGS that prevent the package from being built properly.

gottcode commented on 2017-08-24 19:51

@neo-alquimista Because no Arch Linux developer or Trusted User has started packaging it? I suppose you could ask on one of the mailing lists to see if anybody is interested. I've never requested having one of my projects added to a distro, so I don't know what the proper etiquette is. My projects just end up packaged eventually.