Package Details: freetube-git 0.21.3.beta.r7120.3385f63-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freetube-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freetube-git
Description: An open source desktop YouTube player built with privacy in mind - built from git source tree.
Upstream URL: https://freetubeapp.io
Licenses: AGPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: freetube
Provides: freetube
Submitter: picokan
Maintainer: picokan
Last Packager: picokan
Votes: 21
Popularity: 0.39
First Submitted: 2020-10-01 22:23 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-08 20:29 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

picokan commented on 2024-10-08 20:30 (UTC)

Sorry about the broken .sh file (again).

cuan commented on 2024-10-05 19:55 (UTC)

The update to electron32 only changed the dependency. The electron version in freetube.sh also needs to be updated. The version in the PKGBUILD's prepare function should also be updated. This package is currently broken.

italoghost commented on 2024-09-21 02:25 (UTC)

Hi! The app received an electron bump last month:

https://github.com/FreeTubeApp/FreeTube/pull/5613

Could you update to electron32?

Thanks

xAsh commented on 2024-07-18 21:30 (UTC)

Can't build since yesterday, /bin/sh: line 1: run-s: command not found

picokan commented on 2024-06-15 07:00 (UTC)

Sorry for leaving the .sh file broken for so long.

AndyRTR commented on 2024-06-15 06:37 (UTC)

You can now move to elevtron31 changing the dependency in PKGBUILD an freetube.sh. Please also fix the unknown license to be SPDX compliant.

Bink commented on 2024-06-12 00:14 (UTC)

Rebuilding today, I was able to successfully launch without electron29 installed.

Bink commented on 2024-06-03 21:09 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-03 21:11 (UTC) by Bink)

It seems to be depending on electron29 still. It was unlaunchable until I manually installed electron29.

$ freetube
/usr/bin/freetube: line 3: electron29: command not found

AndyRTR commented on 2024-06-02 16:50 (UTC)

freetube.sh needs to be moved to electron30 as well. The yarn fix shouldn't be needed when building the recomened way in clean chroot.

italoghost commented on 2024-06-02 15:45 (UTC)

Hi, @picokan! I think you can remove the extra ENVs as it as was a kernel bug and it was solved on v6.9.3. You can read more here.

Besides that, have you considered going back to the system electron? I know that the currently supported electron on the project is the 30 (the same as the currently system electron), but as you said earlier, it is good to avoid keeping multiple electron versions.