Package Details: fsharp 4.0.1.20-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/fsharp.git (read-only)
Package Base: fsharp
Description: The Open Edition of the F# compiler, core library and tools
Upstream URL: http://fsharp.org/
Keywords: F#
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: lpjhjdh
Maintainer: soimort
Last Packager: soimort
Votes: 31
Popularity: 1.366250
First Submitted: 2008-12-09 22:51
Last Updated: 2016-11-14 13:35

Latest Comments

fusion809 commented on 2016-10-14 09:13

Haven't the foggiest, if I were you I'd report this bug at the upstream bugtracker. To create a new issue go to https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp/issues/new.

stratos695 commented on 2016-10-14 09:09

When I try to install 4.0.1.13-1 I get an infinite loop. I've copied a part of the log, can you help me?

http://pastebin.com/0u5DKf0B

btw: Same issue if I edit the pkgbuild and try to use an older version.

I'm using mono 4.6.1.3 & mono-pcl 2014.04.14

soimort commented on 2016-09-27 07:16

It seems the build of fsharpi in 4.0.1.11 is broken for now:

error FS0078: Unable to find the file '/usr/lib/mono/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Interactive.Settings.dll' in any of
/usr/lib/mono/4.5-api
/usr/lib/mono/4.5-api/Facades
/usr/lib/mono/4.5
/usr/lib/mono/4.5/Facades
/home/soimort/Projects/AUR/fsharp
/usr/lib/mono/fsharp/

I'm reverting it to 4.0.1.10 until a proper fix is found.

bladtman commented on 2016-08-31 14:10

Fails to install with warning:
Failed to install built package(s).
fha
fhasfsh

fusion809 commented on 2016-08-05 13:39

@soimort good, although a few minutes after 4.0.1.9 came out 4.0.1.10 came out.

soimort commented on 2016-08-05 13:33

With fsharp 4.0.1.9, no extra patch is needed (they've fixed it in upstream), so I reverted to the status of 4.0.1.1 - Now everything should be built as normal.

soimort commented on 2016-07-21 21:53

Updated to 4.0.1.5. I changed the hardcoded version number in PKGBUILD, though. Thanks, @fusion809!

fusion809 commented on 2016-07-21 19:45

OK I've fixed my PKGBUILD to make it able to build on other systems. The Makefile can be used instead of a patch, provided it doesn't specify the file path as it used to (which is what I fixed). I even tried to build this package in a Docker container, so I know it works.

soimort commented on 2016-07-21 19:35

@fusion809 It seems you've specified "include /home/fusion809/AUR/fsharp/src/fsharp-4.0.1.5/config.make" explicitly in your modified Makefile, but the changes you made to the original fsharp code are completely missing (they have to be provided as patches, too, otherwise your PKGBUILD will not build on another machine).

fusion809 commented on 2016-07-21 18:40

I've even built a 64-bit binary package for FSharp using this PKGBUILD and uploaded it to my personal package repository. https://github.com/fusion809/PKGBUILDs/releases/tag/current.

All comments