Search Criteria
Package Details: fswatch 1.21.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/fswatch.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | fswatch |
| Description: | A cross-platform file change monitor with multiple backends: Apple OS X File System Events API, *BSD kqueue, Linux inotify, Microsoft Windows and a stat-based backend |
| Upstream URL: | https://emcrisostomo.github.io/fswatch/ |
| Licenses: | GPLv3 |
| Submitter: | flaviut |
| Maintainer: | cyqsimon |
| Last Packager: | cyqsimon |
| Votes: | 29 |
| Popularity: | 0.51 |
| First Submitted: | 2015-10-04 22:48 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-05-10 12:15 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
cyqsimon commented on 2026-04-20 02:24 (UTC)
@tippfehlr Ah okay sorry my bad. I just didn't want this to be a waste of time for everyone involved =)
tippfehlr commented on 2026-04-18 14:05 (UTC)
cyqsimon: I’m a PM and asked to see if it makes sense for me to offer it in extra. This is a fine place to do so :)
cyqsimon commented on 2026-04-18 13:33 (UTC)
Guys, this is not the right place for this conversation. Whatever conclusion you reach, it's not going to be actionable by anyone here.
@ra1nb0w If you wish to push this forward, just go talk to TUs directly. Replying here is tantamount to shouting into the void.
tippfehlr commented on 2026-04-18 12:27 (UTC)
we already have watchexec, wouldn’t that also work?
ra1nb0w commented on 2026-04-18 07:22 (UTC)
it is a useful tool that should not require aur or manual installation.
tippfehlr commented on 2026-04-17 20:34 (UTC)
ra1nb0w: I’m not opposed to pull this into extra, but is there any concrete reason to have this in extra?
ra1nb0w commented on 2026-04-17 16:50 (UTC)
To move the package in extra you need to contact one of the maintainers shown in https://archlinux.org/people/package-maintainers/ and hopping they find the software useful.
cyqsimon commented on 2026-01-21 16:03 (UTC)
Sure, although my hopes are not too high. You're welcomed to try though.
It does compile, that's all I can say.
ra1nb0w commented on 2026-01-21 10:32 (UTC) (edited on 2026-01-21 10:32 (UTC) by ra1nb0w)
Reading [1] and then [2], it seems that the actual maintainer should do the move. If you are interested on doing that, I can try to ask in IRC how to get the permission to upload into extra or if there will be a co-maintaner with already the access. Anyway, have you tried fswatch on arm64? just to complete the supported architecture.
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Package_Maintainer_guidelines#Rules_for_packages_entering_the_extra_repository
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:How_to_be_a_packager#Adding_a_new_package
cyqsimon commented on 2026-01-21 09:57 (UTC) (edited on 2026-01-21 09:58 (UTC) by cyqsimon)
@ra1nb0w see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#How_to_get_a_PKGBUILD_into_the_extra_repository.3F
1 2 Next › Last »