Package Details: gdm-settings 5.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gdm-settings.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gdm-settings
Description: A settings app for Gnome's Login Manager, GDM
Upstream URL: https://gdm-settings.github.io
Licenses: AGPL3
Submitter: mazharhussain
Maintainer: mazharhussain
Last Packager: mazharhussain
Votes: 19
Popularity: 2.08
First Submitted: 2022-01-22 12:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-09 18:55 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

JKMooney commented on 2023-01-31 17:20 (UTC)

Working now, thanks :)

mazharhussain commented on 2023-01-31 12:33 (UTC)

Fixed it again.

And found the source of the problem. See https://github.blog/changelog/2023-01-30-git-archive-checksums-may-change.

xuanruiqi commented on 2023-01-31 05:34 (UTC)

Yeah, needs another hash bump...

kojq commented on 2023-01-31 03:39 (UTC)

Er, the hash is now bd01f3b65e7e13d1bf1e639beda57eeff5916e51404cae358d5ede393d67c84a, which is what it was earlier. Thus, it fails the validity check again...

JKMooney commented on 2023-01-31 03:06 (UTC)

Cleared both yay and paru cache, both still fail validy check with the following message...

=> Making package: gdm-settings 2.0-2 (Mon 30 Jan 2023 10:04:55 PM EST) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found gdm-settings-2.0.tar.gz ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... gdm-settings-2.0.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: gdm-settings

kojq commented on 2023-01-30 20:00 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. I used to manually clear, but I just began using a hook, pacman-cleanup-hook, and overlooked a drawback of it.

mazharhussain commented on 2023-01-30 19:49 (UTC)

You may need to clear the cache of whatever AUR helper you are using before it even tries to download the latest version of the package.

kojq commented on 2023-01-30 19:48 (UTC)

The hash seems correct though.

kojq commented on 2023-01-30 19:46 (UTC)

@mazharhussain I believe the check still fails.

mazharhussain commented on 2023-01-30 19:37 (UTC)

@mrUby, Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Just fixed it.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »