Search Criteria
Package Details: gdu-bin 5.28.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gdu-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | gdu-bin |
| Description: | Fast disk usage analyzer |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/Dundee/gdu |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Conflicts: | gdu |
| Provides: | gdu |
| Submitter: | dundee |
| Maintainer: | dundee |
| Last Packager: | dundee |
| Votes: | 8 |
| Popularity: | 0.091824 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-01-02 17:18 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-21 10:16 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
dundee commented on 2022-05-16 09:10 (UTC)
Freed: It's not the same. This one downloads a binary from Github. The community one is build from source on Arch machines.
Freed commented on 2022-05-15 11:19 (UTC)
This package is same as https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/gdu/, really?
artdev commented on 2021-06-01 19:36 (UTC)
version 5.0.1 was released https://github.com/dundee/gdu/releases/tag/v5.0.1
dundee commented on 2021-02-14 23:00 (UTC)
ouuan: You are right, I's not a good idea. I will revert it.
ouuan commented on 2021-02-13 14:23 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-13 14:25 (UTC) by ouuan)
I don't like the idea of putting this package in /usr/bin/gdu-bin. Is there a good reason to do so? Are there any other packages doing this?
dundee commented on 2021-02-12 14:19 (UTC)
You are right, I will remove it.
ouuan commented on 2021-02-10 10:30 (UTC)
I don't see where it is stated that there could be a "v" at the beginning. The example in ArchWiki has a "BETA" at the tail.
I haven't seen any packages with a version number that starts with "v", and "v4.4.1" is "outdated" at https://repology.org/project/gdu/versions.
dundee commented on 2021-02-10 09:58 (UTC)
Version number can contain letters, see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_versioning
ouuan commented on 2021-02-10 00:35 (UTC)
I think there shouldn't be a "v" in the version number.