Search Criteria
Package Details: gemini-cli 0.4.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gemini-cli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | gemini-cli |
| Description: | An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal. |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli |
| Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
| Submitter: | huyz |
| Maintainer: | huyz |
| Last Packager: | huyz |
| Votes: | 28 |
| Popularity: | 9.97 |
| First Submitted: | 2025-07-10 14:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-09-10 13:58 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- nodejs (nodejs-gitAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR, nodejs-lts-hydrogenAUR, nodejs-lts-iron, nodejs-lts-jod)
- npm (python-nodejs-wheelAUR, corepackerAUR) (make)
Required by (3)
- gemini-cli-proxy-git (optional)
- gemini-openai-proxy-git (optional)
- roo-code-gemini-cli (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
lightdot commented on 2025-09-05 10:55 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-05 10:58 (UTC) by lightdot)
@LemonPie, no, of course not, why would you even suggest that?
If someone prefers to use the git or the binary package, there's nothing stopping anyone from doing so.
But surely you are aware that there are users who prefer to a) build the actual code and b) build targeting the release and not some random git commit. Packages such as this are the norm for the AUR, not the other way around.
LemonPie commented on 2025-09-05 07:45 (UTC)
should this package get deleted from repo? in favor of:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gemini-cli-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gemini-cli-git
lightdot commented on 2025-08-25 10:34 (UTC)
@prochac, non-binary packages (as this one is) must build the project from the source code.
gemini-cli-binuses releases directly from the upstream.prochac commented on 2025-08-24 23:41 (UTC)
Why it uses NPM and not GitHub releases? I'm curious ...and also not much a fan of NPM :D
Spyhawk commented on 2025-08-19 14:08 (UTC)
No, the PKGBUILD directives mention that the pkgname should not be added to a provides array ("Do not add pkgname to the provides array, as it is done automatically.").
It is the
gemini-cli-binthat should include it, not the 'original' package.Dominiquini commented on 2025-08-18 22:02 (UTC)
This package should conflict with 'gemini-cli-bin', or at least provides 'gemini-cli'!
huyz commented on 2025-08-14 13:00 (UTC)
@ptr1337 I have added the BSD license.
ptr1337 commented on 2025-07-26 17:59 (UTC)
Hey :)
I would like to promote this package to the official repository. Would you mind adding a LICENSE BSD to it?
Here is an example: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/cpu-x/-/blob/main/LICENSE?ref_type=heads
Thank you in advance.
lightdot commented on 2025-07-21 13:57 (UTC)
Guys & gals, no need to use the comments to inform the package maintainer about new versions, that's what the "Flag package out-of-date " in the right menu is for. In this case, the package has already been flagged.
Just wait (I know, I know...) for the update or adjust the PKGBUILD manually, the change is trivial - literally just the package version and the hash.
@huyz, if you'd like a co-maintainer, feel free to add me. I'm using the package daily...
Dulbi commented on 2025-07-21 12:30 (UTC)
Please update to the last version v0.1.13: pkgver=0.1.13 sha256sums=('6f599f49d64913fe0bcdbe869f5d64c82141583aa26e6144ae94190114528821')
1 2 Next › Last »