Package Details: gemini-cli 1:0.6.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gemini-cli.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gemini-cli
Description: An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Submitter: huyz
Maintainer: huyz
Last Packager: huyz
Votes: 29
Popularity: 7.82
First Submitted: 2025-07-10 14:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-09-24 07:36 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

lightdot commented on 2025-09-20 02:03 (UTC)

@huyz, I suggest reverting this last changes which introduced the erroneous release numbers. E.g., 0.5.4 and now 0.5.5 are actual releases, these interim 0.0.77 etc. were not.

oech3 commented on 2025-09-19 13:11 (UTC)

ln -sf /usr/bin/rg "$pkgdir/usr/lib/node_modules/@google/gemini-cli/node_modules/@lvce-editor/ripgrep/bin/rg

lightdot commented on 2025-09-05 10:55 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-05 10:58 (UTC) by lightdot)

@LemonPie, no, of course not, why would you even suggest that?

If someone prefers to use the git or the binary package, there's nothing stopping anyone from doing so.

But surely you are aware that there are users who prefer to a) build the actual code and b) build targeting the release and not some random git commit. Packages such as this are the norm for the AUR, not the other way around.

LemonPie commented on 2025-09-05 07:45 (UTC)

should this package get deleted from repo? in favor of:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gemini-cli-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gemini-cli-git

lightdot commented on 2025-08-25 10:34 (UTC)

@prochac, non-binary packages (as this one is) must build the project from the source code. gemini-cli-bin uses releases directly from the upstream.

prochac commented on 2025-08-24 23:41 (UTC)

Why it uses NPM and not GitHub releases? I'm curious ...and also not much a fan of NPM :D

Spyhawk commented on 2025-08-19 14:08 (UTC)

No, the PKGBUILD directives mention that the pkgname should not be added to a provides array ("Do not add pkgname to the provides array, as it is done automatically.").

It is the gemini-cli-bin that should include it, not the 'original' package.

Dominiquini commented on 2025-08-18 22:02 (UTC)

This package should conflict with 'gemini-cli-bin', or at least provides 'gemini-cli'!

huyz commented on 2025-08-14 13:00 (UTC)

@ptr1337 I have added the BSD license.

ptr1337 commented on 2025-07-26 17:59 (UTC)

Hey :)

I would like to promote this package to the official repository. Would you mind adding a LICENSE BSD to it?

Here is an example: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/cpu-x/-/blob/main/LICENSE?ref_type=heads

Thank you in advance.

1 2 Next › Last »