Hi. Can you please remove the options=(debug) entry? This is now at devtools as default used and users don't really require debug symbols as default. Thanks
Search Criteria
Package Details: git-git 2.41.0.rc0.r0.g0df2c18090-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/git-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | git-git |
Description: | A fast distributed version control system |
Upstream URL: | https://git-scm.com/ |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Conflicts: | git |
Provides: | git |
Submitter: | eveharthbrooke |
Maintainer: | andrewSC |
Last Packager: | andrewSC |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.078657 |
First Submitted: | 2015-12-08 10:21 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-05-16 16:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (27)
- curl (curl-quiche-gitAUR, curl-http3-ngtcp2AUR, curl-gitAUR)
- expat (expat-gitAUR)
- grep (grep-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- openssl (openssl-gitAUR, openssl-hardenedAUR, openssl-staticAUR, quictls-opensslAUR)
- pcre2 (pcre2-svnAUR, pcre2-gitAUR)
- perl (perl-gitAUR)
- perl-error
- perl-mailtools
- shadow (shadow-libpassphraseAUR, shadow-relaxedAUR, shadow-selinuxAUR)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compatAUR)
- asciidoc (asciidoc-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-vfsAUR, git-run-command-patch-gitAUR, git-gitAUR, git-fcAUR) (make)
- python (python32AUR, python37AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- xmlto (xmlto-gitAUR) (make)
- libsecret (optional) – libsecret credential helper
- org.freedesktop.secrets (gnome-keyring-gitAUR, pass-secrets-gitAUR, keepassxc-gitAUR, bitw-gitAUR, keepassxc-allow-aur-extension-originAUR, keepassxc-allow-aur-extension-origin-binAUR, gnome-keyring, keepassxc, kwallet5) (optional) – keyring credential helper
- perl-authen-sasl (optional) – git send-email TLS support
- perl-cgi (optional) – gitweb (web interface) support
- perl-datetime-format-iso8601 (optional) – git mediawiki support
- perl-io-socket-ssl (optional) – git send-email TLS support
- Show 7 more dependencies...
Required by (28366)
- 0ad-data-git (requires git) (make)
- 0ad-git (requires git) (make)
- 0verkill-git (requires git) (make)
- 0x-git (requires git) (make)
- 10ff-git (requires git) (make)
- 123-bin (requires git) (make)
- 1oom-git (requires git) (make)
- 1pass-git (requires git) (make)
- 1px-git (requires git) (make)
- 2009scape-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048-cli-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048-curses (requires git)
- 2048-gui-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048-puzzle-bash-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048-terminal-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048.c-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048.cpp-git (requires git) (make)
- 2048term-git (requires git) (make)
- 2bwm (requires git) (make)
- 2bwm-git (requires git) (make)
- Show 28346 more...
Sources (4)
ptr1337 commented on 2023-03-07 19:02 (UTC)
dodecahedron commented on 2021-08-18 02:14 (UTC)
I love how there's five "gits" in git+https://github.com/git/git.git
!
ajddavid452 commented on 2020-10-18 21:20 (UTC)
I love how git is maintened by git, it's GITCEPTION and we get a package called "git-git" which amusingly is kinda reduntant
tuckerboniface commented on 2018-08-28 06:59 (UTC)
This should have git as a make depend.
andrewSC commented on 2018-02-10 18:16 (UTC)
Morganamilo: Unless there's something I don't know, the reason why extra/git provides git-core is because a long time ago the git package used to be named git-core. It's just there for backwards compat if someone has git-core on their system and upgrades.
Morganamilo commented on 2018-01-17 03:25 (UTC)
the git package in extra provides git-core
. Shouldn't this package do the same?
andrewSC commented on 2017-11-02 11:45 (UTC)
If anyone is having an issue building and getting the error: "emacs: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libraqm.so.0: undefined symbol: hb_ft_font_set_load_flags" build and install https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libraqm-git/ then try building again. Let me know if there's any issues.
timofonic commented on 2017-10-12 14:22 (UTC) (edited on 2017-10-12 14:25 (UTC) by timofonic)
@KamranMackey It would be very nice! The more co-maintainers, the better. I think package maintaining should be more collaborative and less individualistic.
--------------OFFTOPIC----------------
I don't agree about the current ABS/AUR maintaining methodology. I would love both ABS and AUR merge with GitLab and have the current features, but having the following:
- Merge/Pull Requests.
- Commenting system for ABS too, not just AUR:
* Adding small attachments: Useful for debugging.
* Lightweight markup languages: Asciidoctor, a very extended MarkDown, ReStructured Text, etc.
- The usual GitLab features and those others coming in 2018 due to bigger FOSS projects migrating to it: GNOME ( https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/35287 ) and Debian ( https://salsa.debian.org ).
eveharthbrooke commented on 2017-10-05 02:07 (UTC)
@andrewSC: is there any chance that I could be a co-maintainer? Just so that way if you ever happen to be MIA temporarily I can update the package while you're gone.
Pinned Comments
andrewSC commented on 2017-11-02 11:45 (UTC)