Package Details: glsl-debugger-git 1:r395.f3139f9-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/glsl-debugger-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: glsl-debugger-git
Description: GLSL source level debugger. This is the Open Source public release of the project originally known as glslDevil.
Upstream URL: http://glsl-debugger.github.io/
Licenses: custom
Submitter: sftrytry
Maintainer: stativ
Last Packager: stativ
Votes: 21
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-12-01 03:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2018-04-01 18:58 (UTC)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-03-15 16:47 (UTC)

https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/teql3v/github_no_longer_supports_git_some_pkgbuilds/

DearVolt commented on 2019-01-03 12:16 (UTC)

This package has been re-released as GLSL-Debugger: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glsl-debugger-git/

qbt937 commented on 2018-02-15 12:00 (UTC)

perl5.26.patch no longer applies cleanly. However, glsl-debugger-git did build when I removed it.

stativ commented on 2017-06-14 20:54 (UTC)

Thank you, fixed.

DarkShadow44 commented on 2017-06-14 03:30 (UTC)

Package fails to build with > Can't locate genTools.pm in @INC (you may need to install the genTools module) (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/share/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl /usr/share/perl5/core_perl) at Enumerants.pl line 32. Cause is probably the project being out of date... Look here for a workaround: https://gist.github.com/DarkShadow44/166373f2751c4def49eccb35e917f242

stativ commented on 2015-01-25 19:52 (UTC)

computerquip: yes, I'm dead serious. The out-of-date flag is for outdated packages. If the package does not build, contact the maintainer directly. If the maintainer doesn't fix the package, fill the disown request and some of the TU's will orphan it, so you can fix it yourself.

computerquip commented on 2015-01-25 19:09 (UTC)

@stativ, are you serious? zer0def's change still needs to be applied. It does not build. How more out of date can this package be when it doesn't build, package, or install correctly at all? Ridiculous comment... https://gist.github.com/c5f70824635eadd5ee2a

stativ commented on 2014-12-16 18:44 (UTC)

computerquip: maybe because it isn't? It's missing dependencies, yes, but it is not outdated.

computerquip commented on 2014-12-15 03:37 (UTC)

Package has been out of date for years now... surprised nobody flagged it.

zer0def commented on 2014-06-03 13:35 (UTC)

Requires: # sed -i 's/functionList/glslang/g' PKGBUILD to package properly now.

1 2 Next › Last »