Search Criteria
Package Details: gnome-defaults-list 47.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gnome-defaults-list.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | gnome-defaults-list |
Description: | Default file associations for GNOME environment |
Upstream URL: | https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnome-session |
Licenses: | GPL, LGPL |
Submitter: | rtimush |
Maintainer: | ItachiSan |
Last Packager: | ItachiSan |
Votes: | 109 |
Popularity: | 0.007091 |
First Submitted: | 2009-01-15 07:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-23 18:19 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
moormaster commented on 2023-12-11 12:57 (UTC)
Link to the source is outdated which makes the build of the package fail: https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_45.0-1.debian.tar.xz
There is another / newer one: https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_45.0-2.debian.tar.xz
ewout commented on 2023-05-30 07:08 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-30 07:09 (UTC) by ewout)
44 version of this package is in upstream. Consider applying the following patch to this package:
jlp2 commented on 2021-05-28 11:08 (UTC)
The Package on Debian seems to be a new one... https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_3.38.0-4.debian.tar.xz The old one is missing and the PKGBUILD are not actual... The new Checksum is: 6884a6004ab10daa645285ede22ad8ab809e243d617cbb85712a1728fbcc7576
Moo-Crumpus commented on 2020-12-23 05:55 (UTC)
sha256sum gnome-session_3.38.0-3.debian.tar.xz 370bbc9ffa9addc7908d9b6d36f1d9821e4fc702d119c442b4c8b9352ef7d230 gnome-session_3.38.0-3.debian.tar.xz
ItachiSan commented on 2020-10-30 19:54 (UTC)
Thanks @jlp2!
Will work on upgrading the package. Seems I have some time now :)
jlp2 commented on 2020-10-22 13:58 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-22 13:58 (UTC) by jlp2)
The Package on Debian seems to be a new one... https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_3.38.0-2.debian.tar.xz The old one is missing and the PKGBUILD are not actual... The new Checksum is: 2bec3882d0f7e818d6867867cc70bf82ba32c18d1edca223e96b68d636868f70
alerque commented on 2020-03-24 06:37 (UTC)
Hesitant of what @ItachiSan? You can look around at all the packages I maintain or co-maintain. Of all the ones I am either a co-maintainer or have added others as co-maintainers I have yet to run into a problem collaborating with others. The
git
history provides quite a bit of accountability in that who did what is always evident and anything can be reverted. If my history in other packages doesn't speak for itself...In my experience the "dark periods" come about starting like any other day, but one thing leads to another and my attention is elsewhere. It's in those times that having co-maintainers in place ahead of time helps because if I don't have time to bump packages I'm probably not in a position to add people either.
ItachiSan commented on 2020-03-23 20:44 (UTC)
Hey @caleb, I appreciate the offer, however I am a bit hesitant.
In case of additional "dark periods" like recently happened, I will accept such offer though. :)
alerque commented on 2020-03-17 05:47 (UTC)
@ItachiSan Offer to help co-maintain this still stands. I often have to manually update my own fork and pass that around to my own systems, it would be nice to just help keep this fresh instead of having to fork.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »