Package Details: gnome-icon-theme 3.12.0-9

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gnome-icon-theme.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gnome-icon-theme
Description: GNOME icon theme
Upstream URL: http://www.gnome.org
Keywords: gnome gnome-icon gnome-icon-theme
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: arojas
Maintainer: wooptoo
Last Packager: wooptoo
Votes: 29
Popularity: 0.062041
First Submitted: 2022-04-01 17:31 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-10-22 17:52 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

wooptoo commented on 2025-09-07 21:19 (UTC)

Reverted to original, bumped pkgrel for a clean rebuild.

tengel commented on 2025-08-06 10:31 (UTC)

In the first commit you made the mistake of downgrading, you also removed the previous Contributor and Maintainer entries which is not cool. https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=gnome-icon-theme&id=756a0b642367175730118c20148dab2b9932d5fb

Please make an update and put back Jan de Groot and Sung Mingi to the Contributor fields at the top of PKGBUILD. This change is unacceptable, never remove previous contributors from source notations.

Shadowized commented on 2025-08-02 12:52 (UTC)

Right, filesystems sort lexicographically(ie 1, 10, 2, 3) because they treat names as strings, not numbers.

<deleted-account> commented on 2025-08-02 11:47 (UTC)

I apologize for the inconvenience, it was my mistake and it turns out that on the gnome-icon-theme download site it only appears up to version 3.9 but it has up to version 3.12

<deleted-account> commented on 2025-08-02 11:38 (UTC)

I just corrected

shoryuken commented on 2025-08-02 10:43 (UTC)

Hello, I apologize for downgrading the package, I promise I will make a correction

Thank you!

<deleted-account> commented on 2025-08-02 10:39 (UTC)

Hello, I apologize for downgrading the package, I promise I will make a correction

shoryuken commented on 2025-08-02 08:25 (UTC)

Seems quite suspicious that the first change by the new "maintainer" is to break the package by downgrading it, with all the abuse happening in the AUR lately it is probably best to avoid this.

Without a response from him after several comments on the subject, yes, clearly.

Shadowized commented on 2025-08-02 08:20 (UTC)

Seems quite suspicious that the first change by the new "maintainer" is to break the package by downgrading it, with all the abuse happening in the AUR lately it is probably best to avoid this.

jongeduard commented on 2025-07-29 01:08 (UTC)

Why are we getting a downgrade?

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »