Arch Linux User Repository

Yup, 3.14.0-2 builds just fine. Thanks!

@katt I was not able to replicated but I suspect it might be related to GOFLAGS. Released a new pkgrel, does that fix your issue?

@Crandel Fixed.

3.14.0-1 fails to build:

# github.com/go-task/task/v3/cmd/task
loadelf: $WORK/b096/_pkg_.a(_x001.o): 172480: sym#6 (g_cgo_export.c.97ba25c3): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b096/_pkg_.a(_x002.o): 172484: sym#6 (cgo_linux.cgo2.c.e1a05304): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b096/_pkg_.a(_x003.o): 172488: sym#6 (cgo_resnew.cgo2.c.d0a17ed0): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b096/_pkg_.a(_x004.o): 172492: sym#6 (cgo_socknew.cgo2.c.00cb1c10): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b096/_pkg_.a(_x005.o): 172496: sym#6 (cgo_unix.cgo2.c.7e81d35a): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x001.o): 172480: sym#6 (g_cgo_export.c.97ba25c3): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x002.o): 172503: sym#6 (cgo.cgo2.c.547524ab): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x003.o): 172507: sym#6 (gcc_context.c.0c594a6b): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x004.o): 172511: sym#6 (gcc_fatalf.c.3e061156): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x005.o): 172515: sym#6 (gcc_libinit.c.c9eb4283): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x006.o): 172519: sym#6 (gcc_linux_amd64.c.2ca0ecdf): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x007.o): 172523: sym#6 (gcc_mmap.c.731b36c1): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x008.o): 172527: sym#6 (gcc_setenv.c.16815d59): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x009.o): 172531: sym#6 (gcc_sigaction.c.ba68fc61): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x010.o): 172535: sym#6 (gcc_traceback.c.2a322f93): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x011.o): 172539: sym#6 (gcc_util.c.0897e946): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b065/_pkg_.a(_x012.o): 172543: sym#6 (linux_syscall.c.16cf6e78): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b064/_pkg_.a(_x001.o): 172551: sym#6 (g_cgo_export.c.869740e2): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b064/_pkg_.a(_x002.o): 172555: sym#6 (cgo_listgroups_unix.cgo2.c.3691faa8): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b064/_pkg_.a(_x003.o): 172559: sym#6 (cgo_lookup_unix.cgo2.c.b224d99e): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
loadelf: $WORK/b064/_pkg_.a(_x004.o): 172563: sym#6 (getgrouplist_unix.cgo2.c.e696ab30): ignoring symbol in section 4 (type 0)
/usr/lib/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64/link: too many errors
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
==> Removing chroot copy [/var/lib/aurbuild/x86_64/katt-236973]...done
==> ERROR: Build failed

Can you please add zsh completion to the package() section?

install -Dm644 completion/zsh/_task "${pkgdir}/usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_task"

@carsme: wait? no issue at all, the "aur job" is low effort, everybody can put time when they have it, so no worries.

Anyway I was not sure about upstream approval instead you did the trick, very nice! I'm glad that we are going to have the bash completion now, thanks!

@grawlinson, @brokenpip3: Sorry for the long wait on this. I've submitted a pull request that will make completions for bash and fish simple to implement: https://github.com/go-task/task/pull/738.

Struggled a bit with Zsh so I think I'll leave that be for now.

@brokenpip3: Did you ever get around to hacking on these completions?

yeah I don't know if name-related changes will be accepted on the upstream repo, I was thinking of a classic-ugly-hack sed replacing :)

Let's see if they are going to accept the PR, anyway thanks for your effort!

It's on my TODO to add completions. I think it will need some upstream changes to make it easy to modify the executable name in the completion files. I'll try to get it done this weekend :)

also I saw that we are not packaging the bash completions, if you want I can create a patch for that too and send it here. Or if you want you can make me co-maintainer so I can commit those changes myself, check my other packages, it's up to you :)