Package Details: graal 1.0.0_rc1-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: graal
Description: Universal virtual machine for running applications written in a variety of languages (JVM-based, LLVM-based, or other)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom
Provides: java-environment=8
Submitter: lucaswerkmeister
Maintainer: lucaswerkmeister
Last Packager: lucaswerkmeister
Votes: 5
Popularity: 1.011642
First Submitted: 2018-04-27 22:24
Last Updated: 2018-04-28 18:36

Dependencies (1)

Required by (741)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

lucaswerkmeister commented on 2018-10-20 12:38

@rpodgorny I wasn’t sure what I should do with it (disown? delete? merge?), so I asked on r/archlinux 1 – so far it sounds like deletion is the best option, so I’ll probably do that in a few hours.

rpodgorny commented on 2018-10-20 12:04

@lucaswerkmeister ...could you delete this one to prevent future confusion?

oh, and thanks for maintaining it! ;-)

lucaswerkmeister commented on 2018-10-20 11:00

Thanks @zhangkaizhao! I’ve updated the provides=() of the graal-bin package, which is the one you should be using instead of this one. (The depends=() had already been updated there earlier.)

zhangkaizhao commented on 2018-10-20 07:13

Hello! Nice packaging!

And I suggest adding java-runtime-common to depends and also java-runtime=8 to provides which would make graal be a replacement of both jdk8-openjdk and jre8-openjdk. I have tested graal against freecol/freemind/... and they work well together.

Some diff:

+depends=('java-environment-common' 'java-runtime-common')
+provides=('java-environment=8' 'java-runtime=8')

rpodgorny commented on 2018-10-02 08:18

oh. i have no idea what "merge" is good for... :-( can try. ;-)

lucaswerkmeister commented on 2018-10-01 21:48

I mean that, if I go to the “Submit Request” interface on AUR, I have three options for this package: Delete, Merge, or Orphan.

rpodgorny commented on 2018-10-01 21:45

what do you mean by "merge"? graal-bin started as a copy of this package and further updates stopped here - so i guess just deleting it would be fine (same for graalpython, truffleruby, ...)

lucaswerkmeister commented on 2018-10-01 20:46

Would deletion or merging into graal-bin be better?

rpodgorny commented on 2018-10-01 19:28

could this package be deleted to reduce possible confusion with graal-bin?

lucaswerkmeister commented on 2018-05-02 22:31

Alright, graal-bin exists now. And I’ll do the same thing for fastr, graalpython and truffleruby next…