Package Details: grub-luks-keyfile 2:2.02-5

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: grub-luks-keyfile
Description: GNU GRand Unified Bootloader (2) with crypto extensions to support for DMCrypt and LUKS volumes with detached headers and key files.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: grub, grub-bios, grub-common, grub-efi-x86_64, grub-emu, grub-legacy
Provides: grub, grub-bios, grub-common, grub-efi-x86_64, grub-emu
Replaces: grub, grub-bios, grub-common, grub-efi-x86_64, grub-emu
Submitter: kalbasit
Maintainer: kalbasit
Last Packager: kalbasit
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.849083
First Submitted: 2017-12-22 02:31
Last Updated: 2018-06-13 16:35

Dependencies (23)

Required by (42)

Sources (19)

Latest Comments

gamezelda commented on 2018-06-12 22:17

@kalbasit Sure, I’ll take a look at it tomorrow.

kalbasit commented on 2018-06-12 17:36

@gamezelda Care to submit a pull request with your fixes? I host this AUR package at

gamezelda commented on 2018-06-12 15:10

The package does not build complaining about not finding freetype2 (despite being installed).

I have been able to install it by rebasing on the last PKGBUILD:

gamezelda commented on 2018-06-12 15:08

@nils_92 You need to trust those GPG keys by adding them to your keyring before trying to build the package:

gpg --recv-keys 35A93B74E82E4209
gpg --recv-keys 1A09227B1F435A33

nils_92 commented on 2018-03-26 10:12

Unfortunately it does not build with the following error

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... grub-2.02.tar.xz ... FAILED (unknown public key 35A93B74E82E4209) unifont-10.0.06.bdf.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 1A09227B1F435A33) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build grub-luks-keyfile.

kalbasit commented on 2018-03-18 18:22

@mxfm I just pushed an update, thanks for the report!

mxfm commented on 2018-03-18 18:18


:) Sorry, pushed wrong button...

kalbasit commented on 2018-03-18 18:16

@mxfm I asked for a PR not an issue :). That's fine, I can push an update myself.

mxfm commented on 2018-03-18 08:28

However, I don't understand why I should write there. Github page appears to be exact clone of this page, which provides necessary infrastruction to deal with those problems.

kalbasit commented on 2018-03-18 06:14

@mxfm I pushed this repo to would you be able to send me a PR? Thank you!

All comments