Package Details: gtk2-smooth-engine 0.6.0.1-5

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gtk2-smooth-engine.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gtk2-smooth-engine
Description: Smooth themes for gtk2 without the need for gtk1
Upstream URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/smooth-engine
Licenses: LGPL
Conflicts: gtk-smooth-engine
Replaces: gtk-smooth-engine
Submitter: ConnorBehan
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: ConnorBehan
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2010-04-15 20:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-03-14 18:51 (UTC)

Latest Comments

ConnorBehan commented on 2022-06-05 17:32 (UTC)

Orhpaning because I don't know if this still works and see no reason to check.

micwoj92 commented on 2021-03-14 15:59 (UTC)

Hello, could you update links to https?

ConnorBehan commented on 2013-12-09 10:10 (UTC)

For the last couple years this has had a bug with certain apps that use compositing (like xfce4-panel). I have no time to look into it, but post here if you know how to fix the strange colors.

ConnorBehan commented on 2010-10-30 17:09 (UTC)

Temporary fix is enabling the deprecated polygon type. When they remove that completely some rewriting will be necessary.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-10-23 15:29 (UTC)

Gives this error when building src/smooth_gtk2_drawing.c: In function 'smooth_draw_extension': src/smooth_gtk2_drawing.c:1570:69: error: 'GDK_EVEN_ODD_RULE' undeclared (first use in this function) src/smooth_gtk2_drawing.c:1570:69: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[3]: *** [smooth_gtk2_drawing.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/projects/builds/gtk2-smooth-eng It will build if you comment out that section but then doesn't run very well at all

ConnorBehan commented on 2010-09-06 18:10 (UTC)

Heh, talk about careless.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-09-06 15:54 (UTC)

The careless.diff validity check fails. Needs to be updated.

ConnorBehan commented on 2010-08-28 00:38 (UTC)

They made a careless mistake... "part" only gets a value assigned using "else if" conditionals... there is no "else"... yet it is very likely to be referenced again.