Search Criteria
Package Details: gtkglext 1.2.0-20
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gtkglext.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | gtkglext |
Description: | An OpenGL extension to GTK2. |
Upstream URL: | https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gtkglext |
Licenses: | LGPL-2.0-or-later |
Submitter: | lquidfire |
Maintainer: | lquidfire |
Last Packager: | lquidfire |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 2.32 |
First Submitted: | 2024-07-17 09:50 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-09-01 14:50 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- glib2 (glib2-gitAUR, glib2-selinuxAUR, glib2-patched-thumbnailerAUR)
- glu (glu-gitAUR)
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libgl (nvidia-340xx-utilsAUR, libglvnd-gitAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglpAUR, libglvnd)
- libxmu
- pango (pango-gitAUR)
- glib2-devel (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
lquidfire commented on 2024-09-01 15:03 (UTC)
Yes, thanks @cmounce! Just fixed that. Won't push a new pkgrel for that.
cmounce commented on 2024-09-01 02:52 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-01 02:53 (UTC) by cmounce)
FYI, I see in the Git log that you renamed some patch files, but it looks like they got duplicated instead of getting renamed?
Here's the current tree. There are two identical copies of the
001-
patch, as well as of the002-
patch. It showed up in my Git diff as a bunch of added lines of code, and it took me a minute to figure out what was going on.Based on the sources that are actually being used, I think we just need to delete
001-kill-pangox.patch
and002-gtk2.20.patch
.lquidfire commented on 2024-08-26 20:37 (UTC)
No worries. I have added the gnome.org source as well. You can choose which one to use by editing the PKGBUILD. I pkgdiff'ed them and there are no changes on this date. Fedora and consorts use gnome.org as a source (while many other distro's use SourceForge, as can be traced via repology).
Thanks for checking and making sure things are in order.
urbenlegend commented on 2024-08-26 17:52 (UTC)
Ah, okay if that was the original source for the version in the official repos, then my concerns are gone. I do see that Sourceforge was the original source according to https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gtkglext/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads
No need to change if that's been working fine, I was just being cautious whenever I install a new AUR package. Thanks for the clarification @lquidfire!
lquidfire commented on 2024-08-25 19:57 (UTC)
I copied the PKGBUILD that had been used on official Archlinux repos before it was orphaned. Not sure what source other distro's use, but I do see sourceforge referenced there as well gnome.org. Could have a look to see if there is any difference between the sources. Thanks for bringing this up.
urbenlegend commented on 2024-08-23 22:55 (UTC)
Is there a reason why this package is using Sourceforge as a source and not an official Gnome repo like https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gtkglext
Is Sourceforge even an official source for gtkglext? I can't find any reference to Sourceforge from the Web Archives of the defunct gtkglext page: https://projects.gnome.org/gtkglext/
This just makes it harder to verify whether this AUR package is grabbing from correct sources and not some random repo.
lquidfire commented on 2024-08-21 18:36 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-25 19:57 (UTC) by lquidfire)
Hi MarsSeed,
Thanks, and thank you for the suggestions.
I've added glib2, but not yet uploaded.
Question 1: pango was dropped 16 years ago. Not sure why. I have re-added it in the meantime.
Question 2: What is this libgl? I can't find it. libglvnd is the vendor-neutral version that will use whichever driver is in use?
Thank you for your reply! Cheers!
MarsSeed commented on 2024-08-20 21:43 (UTC)
Hm, also please kindly change the depends=
libglvnd
to the interface name depends=libgl
(declaring a virtually provided name of the former package).This is the established packaging convention on Arch.
MarsSeed commented on 2024-08-20 21:41 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for this fine PKGBUILD.
Please kindly add the following needed direct dependencies, as per reported by the official Arch namcap package analysis tool:
Thanks in advance!
archnewbtw commented on 2024-07-30 08:12 (UTC)
That fixed it! Thank you so much!!!
1 2 Next › Last »