Search Criteria
Package Details: hax11-git r168.dfba8a5-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/hax11-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | hax11-git |
Description: | Hackbrary to Hook and Augment X11 protocol calls |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/CyberShadow/hax11 |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | CyberShadow |
Maintainer: | CyberShadow |
Last Packager: | CyberShadow |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.004454 |
First Submitted: | 2016-08-31 19:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-26 21:42 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- lib32-glibc (lib32-glibc-gitAUR, lib32-glibc-linux4AUR, lib32-glibc-eacAUR, lib32-glibc-eac-binAUR, lib32-glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- lib32-gcc-libs (lib32-gcc-libs-gitAUR, lib32-gccrs-libs-gitAUR, lib32-gcc-libs-snapshotAUR) (make)
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR) (make)
- libxxf86vm (make)
- xorgproto (xorgproto-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
acuifex commented on 2024-03-18 17:20 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-18 17:36 (UTC) by acuifex)
Sorry, completely forgot that I've left the comment. It was mostly a hypothetical when i was writing the comment, though it had a side-effect of creating a bunch of configs, and it unexpectedly working because of the config. I've had issues with WarThunder and its anticheat because of hax11 in the past (not because of the automatic injection), so i try to avoid having it injected unless i need it.
CyberShadow commented on 2024-02-26 21:42 (UTC)
I have to ask, is that a hypothetical, or have you actually seen problems with hax11?
acuifex commented on 2024-02-26 21:17 (UTC)
Hi! Please remove the
/etc/profile.d
script. Injecting into processes by default isn't great because it might trigger anticheats, integrity checkers, may lead to hard-to-debug errors, and this might be an undesired behavior in some circumstances. An option to inject into everything is fine, but it shouldn't be the default behavior in my opinion.CyberShadow commented on 2022-07-19 08:26 (UTC)
Please don't abuse the out-of-date flagging system.