Package Details: hibiscus 2.8.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/hibiscus.git (read-only)
Package Base: hibiscus
Description: HBCI banking plugin for jameica.
Upstream URL: https://www.willuhn.de/projects/hibiscus/
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: jakob
Maintainer: fordprefect
Last Packager: fordprefect
Votes: 70
Popularity: 0.078133
First Submitted: 2006-10-21 16:12
Last Updated: 2018-05-23 07:52

Latest Comments

hades0299 commented on 2018-05-23 12:24

@fordperfekt: didnt know about the update, so i can understand that. And forgot to check jameicas comments, my bad ;)

OJaksch commented on 2018-05-23 08:41

@fordprefect You're always welcome! I know that problem, too - when I'm drunk but thinking to be the Master of Universe :)

fordprefect commented on 2018-05-23 07:57

@OJaksch: thanks, fixed. Thats what you get if you do updates late at night I guess…

OJaksch commented on 2018-05-23 07:49

Seems that you forgot to run 'mksrcinfo' before committing, as your provided .SRCINFO is still at 2.6.6 (the same with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jameica ) :)

fordprefect commented on 2018-05-17 08:29

@hades0299: the pinned comment for jameica (which you are using as well) states, that there are problems with java9 at the moment. I was not even aware of the existence of java10 yet. Since your proposal would be a very temporary fix (release expected in the next weeks), I will not take any action on this now. I might introduce a build-time warning if an incompatible java version is found.

hades0299 commented on 2018-05-16 20:55

as of https://www.willuhn.de/products/hibiscus/download.php this package needs java 7 or 8. With Java 9 or 10 some plugins might not work.

I had Problems with java 10, on a fresh install, so copuld it be possible to correct the version requirements?

It also looks like they dropped support for java 5 and 6.

fordprefect commented on 2016-06-09 12:01

@boenki: thats one way to see it. it contains hbci4java libraries for 32 and 64bit, thus not being suitable for other architectures besides them. you are right that the 32 and 64bit packages do not differ, but any might include arm as well, which is not true here. thats why i chose to not change to arch="any".

boenki commented on 2016-06-09 11:55

'arch' should be 'any'

fordprefect commented on 2016-06-07 07:26

and while we are at it please quote all paths econtaining variables like srcdir or pkgdir. those will break otherwise if the build path contains spaces.

boenki commented on 2016-06-06 21:13

'arch' should be 'any'
'license' should be 'GPL2'
'cd $srcdir' is not necessary
'mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/share/applications' can be replaced by adding the '-D' argument to the install line
'Nice' in the description is ... (?)

All comments