Package Details: ht-editor 2.1.0-8

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ht-editor.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ht-editor
Description: executable file editor viewer analyzer for MZ, PE and LE.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sebastianbiallas/ht
Keywords: ht ht-editor hte
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: orhun
Maintainer: orhun (severach, 4shadoww)
Last Packager: severach
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-02-08 23:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-03-31 01:35 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

teddy525 commented on 2026-03-30 06:36 (UTC) (edited on 2026-03-30 06:45 (UTC) by teddy525)

It fails to build with this error and the source code from github also fails the same way. Might be better off looking for an already compiled version of it.


evalparse.c: In function ‘yyparse’:
evalparse.c:1279:16: error: too many arguments to function ‘yylex’; expected 0, have 1
 1279 |       yychar = yylex (&yylval);
      |                ^~~~~  ~~~~~~~
In file included from eval.h:49,
                 from evalparse.y:9:
lex.h:10:5: note: declared here
   10 | int yylex();
      |     ^~~~~

4shadoww commented on 2021-02-06 20:20 (UTC)

@Svenstaro I don't know should this be renamed or should this http thing to be named as ht-rust. I am okay with either way. I don't know does the main maintainer have any thoughts on this.

svenstaro commented on 2021-02-06 06:56 (UTC)

I'm not sure what kind of mailing list you mean. I want to talk to the maintainer of this package to see whether they're ok with renaming this and the mailing list wouldn't do much to that end. I suppose we could name the new ht "ht-rust" instead but I think it'd be nicer to have ht-editor and ht.

mxfm commented on 2021-02-06 06:45 (UTC)

@Svenstaro Are you sure that this http client has no alternative name? In this case why not writing request in the relevant mailing list?

svenstaro commented on 2021-02-06 06:06 (UTC)

Any chance this could be renamed to ht-editor again? There's now ht and it does conflict and this one does not have an alternative name it could use.

Excelsior commented on 2020-10-26 09:23 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-26 09:53 (UTC) by Excelsior)

Build failed with gcc10. Passed after adding this line

_mflags+='CXXFLAGS=-Wno-narrowing'

after

local _mflags=()

in build function of PKGBUILD.

severach commented on 2018-03-18 21:06 (UTC)

I took over the package in bulk after all the notifications. All available patches are unreliable. I added a proper patch for abs().

mxfm commented on 2018-02-17 04:12 (UTC)

Can someone takeover the package and make PKGBUILD change specified in the comment below?

wheatdog commented on 2018-02-02 08:19 (UTC)

Add this prepare function to PKGBUILD, then you can build with gcc7.

prepare() {
  cd "$srcdir"/$pkgname-$pkgver
  sed -ie 's/abs(a - b)/abs((int)(a - b))/' htapp.cc
}

1 2 Next › Last »