Package Details: initscripts-fork 2014.09.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/initscripts-fork.git (read-only)
Package Base: initscripts-fork
Description: Maintained fork of system initialization/bootup scripts
Upstream URL: https://bitbucket.org/TZ86/initscripts-fork/overview
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: initscripts, initscripts-systemd
Provides: initscripts, initscripts-systemd
Replaces: initscripts, initscripts-systemd
Submitter: TZ86
Maintainer: TZ86
Last Packager: TZ86
Votes: 26
Popularity: 0.000047
First Submitted: 2012-12-01 17:42
Last Updated: 2015-07-05 07:30

Dependencies (16)

Required by (3)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

ConnorBehan commented on 2015-12-19 04:10

If anyone else is annoyed by the arch-tmpfiles script, the answer is probably one of these: https://bitbucket.org/TZ86/initscripts-fork/issues/3/collecting-patches-for-the-ever-evolving

Let me know if any other scripts are buggy too.

kozec commented on 2014-10-30 09:08

@TZ86
That was it. Thanks!

TZ86 commented on 2014-10-30 06:11

@kozec
If systemd has been removed from your system you should install tmpfiles-config package.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tmpfiles-config/

kozec commented on 2014-10-29 11:13

Hi!

/run/lock suddenly went missing on my system. Shouldn't it be created on each boot by initscripts?

r08 commented on 2014-03-19 00:34

Can't thank you enough for this man. Keep up the great work!

TZ86 commented on 2014-02-21 05:19

@OrdinaryMagician
Thx.

OrdinaryMagician commented on 2014-02-20 21:11

It'd be nice to add kbd as a dependency, I've noticed it went missing after cleanup when I got rid of systemd.

TZ86 commented on 2013-12-19 09:01

@mdevaev
Thanks but it's already fixed in sysvinit 2.88-14.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sysvinit/ (see last comment)

mdevaev commented on 2013-12-18 12:03

Sysvinit-tools package has been removed from the repository and some utilites such as killall5 missing in procps-ng. I have a package that provides them without conflict with procps-ng.

https://github.com/mdevaev/sysvinit-tools-adds
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sysvinit-tools-adds/

Mektub commented on 2013-10-07 12:33


TZ86,

Works OK for me now.
Thanks,

Mektub

TZ86 commented on 2013-10-06 06:07

@pouar
@Mektub
Sorry, fixed.

Mektub commented on 2013-10-06 04:21

Like pouar, I need it too.

Mektub

pouar commented on 2013-10-05 22:52

can you put arch-daemons and the systemd related stuff back. I currently use this along side systemd to get rc.d scripts compatibility.

Anonymous comment on 2013-08-13 15:51

Like!

kozec commented on 2013-06-28 22:22

Hi!
First, I would like to thank you for this package. My system got screwed by update today and I almost managed to get systemd "working" when I finally found this.

As there are some daemons in both official repos and AUR which aren't providing rc.d compatible scripts anymore, I hacked together small script that can run most of systemd .service units from rc.d directory just by symlinking (or copying) it to appropriate name.
For example, I can do "ln -s /etc/rc.d/systemd-unit /etc/rc.d/NetworkManager" and start/stop NM with "rc.d stop NetworkManager"

It can run everything I tested so far except systemd version of dbus daemon. If anyone is interested, here is a link - http://pastebin.com/1F5kte5K

mdevaev commented on 2013-06-20 22:42

The script /usr/bin/rc.d want to change the path from /sbin/runlevel to /usr/bin/runlevel.

mdevaev commented on 2013-06-18 14:37

Thank you for your work!

maandree commented on 2013-06-09 09:26

@Thar When a PKGBUILD was written for initscripts-git (used for testing) in 2010 it was added from the beginning:
https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commit/dc2eab4ef09c216deac86cb68b6834d8306ae545
So I would assume that the PKGBUILD for initscripts without -git also had it.

maandree commented on 2013-06-09 09:24

@Thar When a PKGBUILD was written for initscripts-git in 2010 it was added from the beginning:
https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commit/dc2eab4ef09c216deac86cb68b6834d8306ae545
So I would assume that the PKGBUILD for initscripts without -git also had it.

aksr commented on 2013-06-04 17:34

TZ86: Is this fork actively developed?

Thar commented on 2013-06-03 18:26

If this is a replacement for initscripts, why does it depend on sysvinit? This makes it incompatible with systemd-sysvcompat and old initscripts package doesn't have this dependency.

jhernberg commented on 2013-04-07 18:03

Am about to nuke some initscripts for packages in aur, do you want them?

OrdinaryMagician commented on 2013-02-09 15:21

Damn, you guys beat me to it. I was going to fork them too. :3

TZ86 commented on 2013-02-08 10:31

@Jristz: Yes, we already working on it: https://bitbucket.org/TZ86/arch-rcscripts. I hope to finish some things soon and put it to AUR

Jristz commented on 2013-02-06 03:56

with the actualremove of many rc.scripts I think that you need saveall of them in another package and make this depend on these

TZ86 commented on 2012-12-02 16:21

>Я говорил вот про это: http://archlinux.org.ru/node/327

Здесь никаких отличий от оригинального initscripts.

>попробуйте поговорить с бывшими участниками проекта arch-server.
>Попробуйте поговорить вот с этим человеком: http://archlinux.org.ru/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=196
>Желаю удачи!

Спасибо!.

TZ86 commented on 2012-12-02 16:06

>Я говорил вот про это: http://archlinux.org.ru/node/327

Здесь никаких отличий от оригинального initscripts.

>попробуйте поговорить с бывшими участниками проекта arch-server.
>Попробуйте поговорить вот с этим человеком: http://archlinux.org.ru/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=196
>Желаю удачи!

Спасибо!.

Anonymous comment on 2012-12-02 14:01

Я говорил вот про это: http://archlinux.org.ru/node/327

Судя по последним новостям, вам придётся либо серъёзно перепиливать не только инитскрипты, либо забросить это дело. Залез на вики, там во все мануалы уже вкорячили systemd.

Как вариант - попробуйте поговорить с бывшими участниками проекта arch-server.
Попробуйте поговорить вот с этим человеком: http://archlinux.org.ru/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=196 . Насколько я его знаю, он тоже не в восторге от текущей ситуации и достаточно опытен, чтобы вам помочь.

Желаю удачи!

TZ86 commented on 2012-12-02 06:00

@ad_user
Если речь про interface/address/netmask/gateway в rc.conf, то их никто не убирал.

TZ86 commented on 2012-12-02 06:00

@ad_user
Если речь про interface/address/netmask/gateway в rc.conf, то их никто не убирал.

TZ86 commented on 2012-12-02 05:55

@ad_user
Если речь про interface/address/netmask/gateway в rc.conf, то их никто не убирал.

Anonymous comment on 2012-12-02 03:49

Гхм, как насчёт старого способа настройки сети, без netcfg'а?