Package Details: intel-ipu6-dkms-git r78.f83b0747b-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/intel-ipu6-dkms-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: intel-ipu6-dkms-git
Description: Intel IPU6 camera drivers (DKMS)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/intel/ipu6-drivers
Licenses: unknown
Conflicts: intel-ivsc-driver-dkms-git
Provides: intel-ivsc-driver-dkms-git
Submitter: thesola10
Maintainer: thesola10
Last Packager: thesola10
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.008178
First Submitted: 2022-08-20 20:52 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-02-02 13:32 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

thesola10 commented on 2024-03-29 10:34 (UTC)

i'm open to accept co-maintainers for the set of IPU6-related packages, don't hesitate to reach out by email

(read: IPU6 is so horrendous i've basically given up on it)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

thesola10 commented on 2024-03-29 10:34 (UTC)

i'm open to accept co-maintainers for the set of IPU6-related packages, don't hesitate to reach out by email

(read: IPU6 is so horrendous i've basically given up on it)

matus commented on 2024-03-04 22:25 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-05 11:47 (UTC) by matus)

facing a similar issue to that reported by @FSund.

$ sudo dmesg | grep ipu6
[    2.350945] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[    2.351335] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Device 0xa75d (rev: 0x1)
[    2.351367] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: physical base address 0x603c000000
[    2.351368] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: mapped as: 0x000000001f630160
[    2.351439] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU in secure mode
[    2.351443] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU secure touch = 0x0
[    2.351445] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU camera mask = 0xff
[    2.368529] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPC reset done
[    2.368532] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: cpd file name: intel/ipu6ep_fw.bin
[    2.368564] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Direct firmware load for intel/ipu6ep_fw.bin failed with error -2
[    2.368567] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Requesting signed firmware failed
[    2.368753] intel-ipu6: probe of 0000:00:05.0 failed with error -2

I've installed intel-ipu6-camera-bin firmware and rebooted the system before installing this package

$ yay -Qs ipu6
local/icamerasrc-git r67.528a6f1-1
local/intel-ipu6-camera-bin r73.af5ba0c-1
local/intel-ipu6-camera-hal-git r95.da2e282-1
local/intel-ipu6-camera-hal-git-debug r95.da2e282-1
local/intel-ipu6-dkms-git r158.fb4c17019-1

FYI, I also tried using the intel-ipu6ep-camera-hal-git package with the same result

$ yay -Qs ipu6
local/icamerasrc-git r67.528a6f1-1
local/intel-ipu6-camera-bin r73.af5ba0c-1
local/intel-ipu6-dkms-git r158.fb4c17019-1
local/intel-ipu6ep-camera-hal-git r95.da2e282-1
local/intel-ipu6ep-camera-hal-git-debug r95.da2e282-1

@thesola10, any other ideas on what could be failing?

thesola10 commented on 2024-02-05 20:47 (UTC)

@FSund you need intel-ipu6-camera-bin to provide firmware

FSund commented on 2024-02-05 20:42 (UTC)

Am I doing something wrong here?

➜ sudo dmesg | grep ipu6
[    3.154934] intel_ipu6: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[    3.154943] intel_ipu6: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
[    3.159688] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[    3.160292] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Device 0xa75d (rev: 0x0)
[    3.160311] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: physical base address 0x624c000000
[    3.160313] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: mapped as: 0x000000007bb4e633
[    3.160464] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU in secure mode
[    3.160466] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU secure touch = 0x0
[    3.160467] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPU camera mask = 0x0
[    3.175725] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: IPC reset done
[    3.175733] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: cpd file name: intel/ipu6ep_fw.bin
[    3.176746] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Direct firmware load for intel/ipu6ep_fw.bin failed with error -2
[    3.176750] intel-ipu6 0000:00:05.0: Requesting signed firmware failed
[    3.178001] intel-ipu6: probe of 0000:00:05.0 failed with error -2

thesola10 commented on 2023-02-20 10:46 (UTC)

updated to the official build process, added old ivsc package as conflicts/replaces for seamless update

twouters commented on 2022-12-16 10:58 (UTC)

It looks like there has been a forced push to the upstream url, impacting the rev-list count. Does this warrant an epoch increment?

thesola10 commented on 2022-10-24 08:28 (UTC)

Switched to Ubuntu patches, everything builds correctly again