Package Details: jabref-latest 20231226-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jabref-latest.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jabref-latest
Description: GUI frontend for BibTeX, written in Java; latest main (master) version from git
Upstream URL: https://www.jabref.org/
Keywords: biber biblatex bibliography bibtex jabref latex manager reference
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: jabref
Provides: jabref
Submitter: j0hannes
Maintainer: j0hannes
Last Packager: j0hannes
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.028979
First Submitted: 2019-04-29 00:07 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-12-27 08:50 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

j0hannes commented on 2019-09-13 09:59 (UTC)

There was a change to Jabref that renders the jar file essentially useles. I wasn't aware of that change until recently, and there's no working solution available yet. The Jabref developers plan to provide a nightly release (like the jar file up to now) in a different format (e.g. deb packages). Once that is running, I will update the PKGBUILD.

<deleted-account> commented on 2019-09-13 09:39 (UTC)

JR doesn't start: Error: Could not find or load main class org.jabref.org.jabref.JabRefLauncher Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jabref.org.jabref.JabRefLauncher

j0hannes commented on 2019-08-30 15:01 (UTC)

Hi deisi,

Jabref has shifted from Java 8 to Java 11 a couple of days ago. I'm still testing the new version with java11-openjfx instead of java8-openjfx. Once I can confirm that everything's working, I will release a new PKGBUILD.

deisi commented on 2019-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-30 14:54 (UTC) by deisi)

Can't get this to run on my machine what I get

Error: A JNI error has occurred, please check your installation and try again Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/jabref/JabRefLauncher has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0

Rhinoceros commented on 2019-08-24 09:50 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll keep that in mind.

j0hannes commented on 2019-08-24 09:37 (UTC)

I asked in #archlinux. The best way to handle this in general, I think, would be an option to request deletion of spam users (alike the request for deletion of individual packages).

Rhinoceros commented on 2019-08-24 09:29 (UTC)

How did the spam get deleted? AFAIK there is no way to report/delete spam in the AUR [a]?

[a] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51319

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »