I wonder if I _just_ mentioned this in the jdk comments section.
Click the *Show all 26 comments* button and find your salvation.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jdk-doc 22.0.1-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jdk |
| Description: | Oracle Java documentation |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
| Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
| Submitter: | td123 |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 1087 |
| Popularity: | 0.22 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-26 00:51 (UTC) |
Det commented on 2012-01-13 04:23 (UTC)
ultramancool commented on 2012-01-13 04:15 (UTC)
Annoying dependency problem, installing this and the jdk over openjdk6 doesn't work - openjdk6 satisfies both java-runtime and java-environment while jre satisfies java-runtime only and jdk satisfies java-environment only. If you have packages installed already that depend on both (eclipse in my case) you need to removed the dependency on jre from the jdk, build them both separately and then install them both at once. Is there some way you can fix this?
Det commented on 2012-01-12 09:50 (UTC)
Actually I already told this in the jre comment section a while back. Just gotta click *Show all 24 comments*: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51908&comments=all
But glad I got to see karol's response too.
karol_007 commented on 2012-01-12 03:48 (UTC)
@wallacecomputer
It's in the pacman's man page and 'pacman -Rh' has it too.
The man page doesn't have a literal '-dd' anywhere but it says "Specify this option twice to skip all dependency checks." pacman devs want to keep it that way (a bit hidden) because they say people overuse this option and break their systems (and whine about it to the devs).
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-01-12 02:55 (UTC)
Just a quick NOTE/Tip for anyone trying to replace openjdk and having problems. Run ( sudo pacman -Rdd jre7-openjdk ) to remove it! Had to search for 20 minutes to figure that one out..............lol
Peace.............Arch
Det commented on 2012-01-07 16:16 (UTC)
Mistake from my previous cosmetic update. Fixed now.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-01-07 15:39 (UTC)
VisualVM doesn't work:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no attach in java.library.path
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
libattach.so is missing. WTF?!
# tar xfv /tmp/jdk-7-linux-x64.tar.gz jdk1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64/libattach.so
jdk1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64/libattach.so
# [root@server lib]# cp jdk1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64/libattach.so /opt/java/jre/lib/amd64/
(via https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1037562#p1037562)
nicoulaj commented on 2012-01-05 19:10 (UTC)
For those interested, I have created a rc.d daemon package for jstatd (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55288).
Det commented on 2011-12-29 08:05 (UTC)
It's what I do.
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.