I read through the comments and saw note about changing PKG_EXT
The change is making it fail with aurget at least to install after compiling.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jdk 23.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jdk |
Description: | Oracle Java Development Kit |
Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | jre |
Provides: | java-environment, java-environment-jdk, java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jdk23-jdk, jre, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
Submitter: | td123 |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 1086 |
Popularity: | 0.107790 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (15)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- hicolor-icon-theme (hicolor-icon-theme-gitAUR)
- java-environment-common
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (2649)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- 2plan-desktop (requires java-environment)
- 389-console (requires java-environment)
- 389-ds-console (requires java-environment) (make)
- aacskeys (requires java-environment) (make)
- ab-download-manager (requires java-environment) (make)
- ab-download-manager-git (requires java-environment) (make)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl (requires java-environment)
- abcl-git (requires java-environment) (make)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- access-export (requires java-environment)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aeron (requires java-environment)
- Show 2629 more...
Sources (9)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 .. 81 Next › Last »
MisterAnderson commented on 2012-10-30 07:38 (UTC)
Det commented on 2012-10-26 13:29 (UTC)
So the plugin is or is not enabled?
kalib commented on 2012-10-26 13:13 (UTC)
Well, I need eclipse for java development.
But my bank doesn't recognize my jre. :/ that's quite sad.. because I can't install jre without removing jdk. :/
kkl2401 commented on 2012-10-26 11:00 (UTC)
Yes, it is better to have JDK because it contains useful tools (which JRE doesn't) but it is not necessary because Eclipse has its own Java compiler.
Det commented on 2012-10-26 10:46 (UTC)
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/Installation#Install_a_JVM:
"Regardless of your operating system, you will need to install some Java virtual machine (JVM). You may either install a Java Runtime Environment (JRE), or a Java Development Kit (JDK), depending on what you want to do with Eclipse. If you intend to use Eclipse for Java development, then you should install a JDK (the JDK includes--among other useful things--the source code for the standard Java libraries). If you aren't planning to use Eclipse for Java development and want to save some disk space, install a JRE."
It shouldn't be an issue, though. The plugin is the same in both JREs.
kkl2401 commented on 2012-10-26 06:58 (UTC)
kalib: Eclipse (as an application) doesn't actually need JDK, it only needs JRE. If eclipse (as a package) requires jdk (as a package), then you should be safely able to modify the PKGBUILD so that it doesn't.
Det commented on 2012-10-25 22:46 (UTC)
Well, it's there. You checked whether the plugin is disabled?
kalib commented on 2012-10-25 20:28 (UTC)
After the last jdk update, my jre have been removed and now my webbank doesn't recognize that I have java. When trying to install jre again (yaourt -S jre) it says that jdk conflicts with jre. But I can't remove jdk because Eclipse needs it. Any tip?
Det commented on 2012-10-25 12:48 (UTC)
And you're welcome for that.
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.