Package Details: jellyfin-server-git 10.12.0.r28174.738d475-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jellyfin-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jellyfin-git
Description: Jellyfin server backend
Upstream URL: https://jellyfin.org
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: jellyfin-server
Provides: jellyfin-server
Submitter: z3ntu
Maintainer: Big-B
Last Packager: Big-B
Votes: 21
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2018-12-11 16:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-01-24 19:22 (UTC)

Required by (14)

Sources (7)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 8 Next › Last »

CryoTheRenegade commented on 2026-03-15 19:37 (UTC)

@Big-B yup, looks like a full system update did it. Weird, I had just performed it yesterday and it was failing. Wonder which package caused it to fail. Either way, all working now. Thank you.

Big-B commented on 2026-03-15 19:24 (UTC)

@CryoTheRenegade apologies for the delay, tried to build this today and didn't run into the issue. Is this resolved for you?

CryoTheRenegade commented on 2026-03-14 17:39 (UTC)

Looks like the simdjson package from extra changed its .so version from .30 to .31, causing the prepare step to fail

Big-B commented on 2025-05-08 23:09 (UTC)

@electricprism I can't replicate. Did you capture a trace or have steps to replicate?

electricprism commented on 2025-04-25 01:43 (UTC)

This package would segfault, thought it might have something to do with the dotnet packages so I installed both -bin and regular versions and neither worked.

Switched back to the main repo jellyfin-server, jellyfin-web, jellyfin-ffmpeg, dotnet..., aspnet... and main repo packages and it worked.

Not sure if dependencies are broken or what's wrong.

Big-B commented on 2025-04-14 14:59 (UTC)

@z3ntu

I'm really not sure what to say. You were asked to make a one line change and your response was not in the spirit of maintainership. I absolutely am sorry if that was the straw that broke the camel's back and drove you away from being a contributor, my intent was merely to remind you of what is expected from repo maintainers.

Wish you all the best, I'll work to break up the packages like you suggested. If you ever want maintainership back, I'm more than happy to hand it back over to you.

z3ntu commented on 2025-04-11 20:34 (UTC)

I'm disowning the package, haven't touched this much recently, and jellyfin stable is in the repos anyways.

Some todo items that the next maintainer should do: * split the package into jellyfin-server-git and jellyfin-web-git, the combined PKGBUILD is just a historical artifact * align PKGBUILDs with the ones from the main repo https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/jellyfin-server/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads & https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/jellyfin-web/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads * and probably some other changes

Good luck! And @Big-B thanks for being so passive aggressive. :)

Big-B commented on 2025-04-11 20:25 (UTC)

@z3ntu

Please refer to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Maintaining_packages for guidance on package maintenance.

Big-B commented on 2025-04-08 14:23 (UTC)

@z3ntu

See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines#Architectures for appropriate PKGBUILD configuration guidance.

Big-B commented on 2025-04-08 14:19 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-08 14:53 (UTC) by Big-B)

@z3ntu

Current setup is: arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'armv6h')

Setup should be: arch=('any')

Or if you insist on needlessly inconveniencing non x86_64 users in direct conflict with the packaging guidelines, then: arch=('x86_64')

Your PKGBUILD is wrong.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 8 Next › Last »