Search Criteria
Package Details: jellyfin-web 10.8.9-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jellyfin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jellyfin |
Description: | Jellyfin web client |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | z3ntu |
Maintainer: | z3ntu |
Last Packager: | z3ntu |
Votes: | 90 |
Popularity: | 2.56 |
First Submitted: | 2019-01-09 16:59 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-01-23 16:56 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- dotnet-sdk-6.0 (dotnet-sdk-6.0-bin) (make)
- git (git-vfs, git-git, git-run-command-patch-git) (make)
- nodejs (nodejs6-bin, nodejs-git, nodejs-nightly, nodejs-lts-fermium, nodejs-lts-gallium, nodejs-lts-hydrogen) (make)
- npm (nodejs6-bin, nodejs-nightly) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 17 Next › Last »
z3ntu commented on 2023-03-14 21:02 (UTC)
@j1simon: Pipe it to
/dev/null
or complain upstream.j1simon commented on 2023-03-14 13:14 (UTC)
It shows too many warnings:
JP-Ellis commented on 2023-02-08 22:14 (UTC)
@z3ntu: PKGBUILD does support an 'all' value for the architecture: it's called
any
:) It is often used by Python packages.CultofRobots commented on 2023-02-08 20:06 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-08 20:17 (UTC) by CultofRobots)
Jellyfin won't build on armv7h or aarch64 natively due to dependencies. There's no dotnet-sdk-6.0 or aspnet-runtime-6.0 in the repos and I have never gotten them to build properly. You can, however, build jellyfin using dotnet-sdk-6.0-bin and aspnet-runtime-6.0-bin from AUR but you will have to install them first and then modify the PKGBUILD.
EDIT: I'm not even sure you need to modify the PKGBUILD once those packages from AUR are installed. You should just be able to do makepkg -A like @z3ntu said.
z3ntu commented on 2023-02-08 19:42 (UTC)
@Levitating: You can easily use "makepkg -A" to ignore the "arch" value and just build it. Should make any package work for you. Too bad PKGBUILD doesn't support an "all" value or something like that.
Levitating commented on 2023-02-08 19:39 (UTC)
Can you add more architectures (like armv7h)? They should compile fine without any alteration and some weird people are running ArchLinux on their Raspberry Pi's.
z3ntu commented on 2023-02-08 14:41 (UTC)
Please stop fighting here. I've provided an answer now quite a few comments below. If the AUR helper is broken with this not-so-edge case it's not my problem. Feel free to suggest a solution but until then please stop spamming the comments here.
gameslayer commented on 2023-02-08 14:13 (UTC)
No I never said I knew everything, you made that assumption here.. Fixing the issue fixes the real issue instead of just avoiding it and being toxic..
CultofRobots commented on 2023-02-08 14:11 (UTC)
Since you know better than everyone else, fork the package and maintain it yourself. That solves everyone's problem here.
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 17 Next › Last »