Package Details: jellyseerr 2.6.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jellyseerr.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jellyseerr
Description: Request management and media discovery tool for the Plex ecosystem
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Fallenbagel/jellyseerr
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: fryfrog
Maintainer: txtsd (fryfrog)
Last Packager: txtsd
Votes: 13
Popularity: 1.25
First Submitted: 2022-05-28 22:52 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-15 14:05 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

Required by (1)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

jkhsjdhjs commented on 2024-11-02 23:55 (UTC)

Created an upstream issue for this: https://github.com/Fallenbagel/jellyseerr/issues/1070

txtsd commented on 2024-11-02 01:28 (UTC)

@jkhsjdhjs That's the node ecosystem for you 😭

jkhsjdhjs commented on 2024-11-02 01:20 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting. Pruning doesn't seem to work correctly, as for example typescript is still present even though it's only listed under devDependencies.

txtsd commented on 2024-11-02 00:44 (UTC) (edited on 2024-11-02 00:48 (UTC) by txtsd)

@jkhsjdhjs The node_modules directory is MASSIVE, yes. It's a little bigger before it's pruned.

jkhsjdhjs commented on 2024-11-01 22:59 (UTC) (edited on 2024-11-01 23:20 (UTC) by jkhsjdhjs)

The new 2.0.x packages are much larger than the 1.9.x releases, something doesn't seem to be quite right here:

Packages (1) jellyseerr-2.0.1-3

Total Installed Size:  1164.65 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:       572.26 MiB

EDIT: The node_modules directory is 1.1GiB in size, fits the meme. It seems to contain a lot of development dependencies, like typescript or babel, at least with my limited nodejs knowledge.

txtsd commented on 2024-11-01 03:23 (UTC)

@picokan Thanks for reporting. I fixed it!

picokan commented on 2024-10-31 20:12 (UTC)

Something's weird with the package, the PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO say that python and java-runtime are dependencies, but they don't show up as so in the web page. And I don't know why those are dependencies either.

jab416171 commented on 2024-10-24 17:39 (UTC)

Sorry all, I'm working with the developer to get this build fixed.

peterninkenpoop commented on 2024-10-24 08:26 (UTC)

Is anyone else able to build the latest release? I'm getting the same errors as @SirMaxwellSmart

angelodalzotto commented on 2024-10-22 10:50 (UTC)

Please add npm as build dep