Package Details: jitsi-meet-desktop 2025.2.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jitsi-meet-desktop.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jitsi-meet-desktop
Description: Jitsi Meet desktop application
Upstream URL: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet-electron
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Submitter: SamWhited
Maintainer: xiota
Last Packager: xiota
Votes: 31
Popularity: 0.32
First Submitted: 2020-04-10 13:16 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-13 23:19 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »

zenlord commented on 2021-03-11 18:56 (UTC)

Doesn't build for me. It tries to download certain js components in the pre-build phase, but somehow the version is not available (looking for v85 whereas available versions only go up to v72)

je-vv commented on 2020-12-10 19:12 (UTC)

Thanks a lot @vasya

vasya commented on 2020-12-10 08:14 (UTC)

At the time I created the alternative package jitsi-meet-electron, no other approaches (including this one) worked for me I think. Now that system electron probably works, however, I've added a recommendation to use this package instead.

je-vv commented on 2020-12-10 01:17 (UTC)

Thanks @lsf, pehaps it would be good to add that in the short description, :) Thanks again.

lsf commented on 2020-12-10 01:07 (UTC)

jitsi-meet-desktop uses system electron, as you've correctly assumed :)

je-vv commented on 2020-12-10 00:57 (UTC)

what's the main difference with jitsi-meet-electron? I'm not sure if jitsi-meet-desktop uses system electron and the jitsi-meet-elctron downloads Jitsi's own electron (saying because the dependencies), but I can't really tell...

qontinuum commented on 2020-10-03 06:18 (UTC)

You should add npm audit fix just after the npm install

lsf commented on 2020-07-23 08:09 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that!

je-vv commented on 2020-07-23 00:49 (UTC)

jitsi-meet-desktop.desktop is broken since it executes jitsi-meet, while the application is jitsi-meet-desktop. Thanks !

lsf commented on 2020-07-22 14:54 (UTC)

@SamWhited: done, thanks!

I'm totally with you on your opinion on electron, it's even worse when building/packaging for non-x86_64-systems. I'm not happy with it, but I'm getting used to getting things to build with it, so I could as well make use of that ;)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »