Search Criteria
Package Details: joplin-beta 3.2.12-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin-beta.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | joplin-beta |
| Description: | A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities (beta version) |
| Upstream URL: | https://joplinapp.org/ |
| Keywords: | joplin markdown note notetaking productivity todo |
| Licenses: | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Conflicts: | joplin, joplin-appimage, joplin-desktop |
| Submitter: | Alkindi |
| Maintainer: | jhenson |
| Last Packager: | jhenson |
| Votes: | 7 |
| Popularity: | 0.192091 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-10-04 21:35 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-01-25 16:13 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- electron32 (electron32-binAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- jq (jaq-binAUR, jq-gitAUR) (make)
- moreutils (moreutils-go-binAUR) (make)
- npm (corepackerAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR) (make)
- nvmAUR (nvm-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR) (make)
- yarn (yarn-pnpm-corepackAUR, corepackerAUR, yarn-berryAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
jhenson commented on 2025-01-25 16:14 (UTC)
nvm was easy enough to switch to so I converted the build to use it and switched to the same node version that upstream uses in their github actions.
jhenson commented on 2025-01-25 00:57 (UTC)
I've never used nvm so I'm not sure. Do you know of an example package that can be built with either one?
ninetailedtori commented on 2025-01-24 17:09 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-24 17:33 (UTC) by ninetailedtori)
Can this be modified to also allow nvm rather than just nodejs?
jhenson commented on 2024-12-25 04:30 (UTC)
I've removed most of the dependencies of this package since they appear (from my testing) to either be dependencies of electron or just not needed at all. If you use this package, please let me know if I'm wrong and I will add the missing deps back.
Eothred commented on 2024-03-22 08:06 (UTC)
Hmm, and just as I say that they add another pre-release.. Then I guess this package will have a usefulness.. Sometimes?
Eothred commented on 2024-03-21 10:17 (UTC)
I think you might very well be right about that, same is true for joplin-beta-appimage in that case.
I've updated to 2.14.20 now in any case. Had some issues with libvips which caused issues building sharp (from what I could understand). I moved it from dependency to conflict.. I see quite a few errors with namcap but I'm not very experienced with node stuff so not sure how to solve (or how much of is it false errors/warnings).
The application seems to work on my system.
fr3nchalp4a commented on 2024-03-18 22:29 (UTC)
Seems to be unuseful now. The "beta", linking to the pre-release, is not following joplin's versioning anymore. They are simply rolling out a latest version, and it doesn't seems that this package is useful at this time. Tell me if I'm wrong
Eothred commented on 2023-10-02 07:56 (UTC)
Sorry for not updating this for a while. Feel free to flag so I get notifaction, I forget at times.
Struggled to build 2.13.1 so I'm leaving it at 2.12.18 for now until I figure out. There is an appimage version if you want the latest&greatest immediately.
Eothred commented on 2023-06-14 20:28 (UTC)
taking over this since no one else is, but I'm quite fresh to npm based packages. I see namcap throws quite a few errors and warnings but for now I leave it. compiled and worked for me.
Qwinci commented on 2021-11-04 12:22 (UTC)
Please fix the PKGBUILD. (Change archlive to archive)
1 2 3 Next › Last »