Package Details: js-beautify 1.15.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/js-beautify.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: js-beautify
Description: CSS, HTML & JavaScript unobfuscator and beautifier
Upstream URL: https://beautifier.io
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: python-cssbeautifier, python-jsbeautifier
Submitter: tokland
Maintainer: C0rn3j
Last Packager: C0rn3j
Votes: 33
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2010-12-04 22:02 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-06 10:26 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

yan12125 commented on 2016-08-18 10:36 (UTC)

Could you update to 1.6.3?

tokland commented on 2015-09-18 09:03 (UTC)

@simon04: I forgot to commit the changes, done.

simon04 commented on 2015-09-18 08:56 (UTC)

You seem to have forgotten to run `mksrcinfo` before committing/pushing. The dependencies as well as the version are still out of date …

tokland commented on 2015-09-15 17:18 (UTC)

@simon04: updated using npm2arch, thx!

simon04 commented on 2015-09-15 13:13 (UTC)

This is as simple as installing https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-npm2arch and running `npm2PKGBUILD js-beautify` afterwards.

tokland commented on 2015-09-15 11:40 (UTC)

No reason other than I didn't know about it. If you can provide the PKGBUILD, I'll be grateful!

simon04 commented on 2015-09-14 12:10 (UTC)

* Version 1.5.10 is out. * Please mention jsbeautifier.org in the description (allows to find this package when searching by the URL of the online converter) * Is there a reason why you don't use https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-npm2arch?

tokland commented on 2015-01-31 20:47 (UTC)

@prurigro: It seems the old github repository points to the new, so let's just replace the PKGBUILD with the one you provided.

prurigro commented on 2015-01-31 07:22 (UTC)

@tokland: Hmm true, it looks like there are python and node versions both available in the same package. I'm not sure if they're both equivalent, but I do notice the python one lacks the html and css shortcuts. Would there be any sense to package both together on that note?

tokland commented on 2015-01-29 19:11 (UTC)

It looks like it's a complete rewrite, with different dependencies, options, etc. Question: does it make sense to create a separate AUR package?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »