Search Criteria
Package Details: juicefs 4.3.8-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/juicefs.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | juicefs |
Description: | A shared POSIX file system for the cloud |
Upstream URL: | https://juicefs.com/ |
Keywords: | cloudstorage filesystem fuse |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | Sasasu |
Maintainer: | Sasasu |
Last Packager: | Sasasu |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2018-12-30 16:28 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2020-10-06 09:39 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
arnottcr commented on 2021-07-06 21:16 (UTC) (edited on 2021-07-06 22:30 (UTC) by arnottcr)
I find the name sharing problematic, but this package should be renamed to
juicefs-bin
. it is not built from source.I am interested in building juicefs from source, so
-bin
and-git
are neither accurate nor desired. would you preferjuicefs
,go-juicefs
,foss-juicefs
,juicefs-fuse
, or something else?Sasasu commented on 2021-07-06 06:27 (UTC)
Yes. and this is the same company with the same author.
Sasasu commented on 2021-07-06 06:16 (UTC)
for axolotl: this is the close source version juicefs, it is a paid service. if you want the opensource version, please create a
juicefs-bin
orjuicefs-git
to provide. the opensource version is very sample. S3FS even better than it.arnottcr commented on 2021-07-06 06:14 (UTC) (edited on 2021-07-06 06:14 (UTC) by arnottcr)
so, do both tools rely upon the same name: "juicefs"? I am looking to package the go tooling, but this appears to squat on the same name.
Sasasu commented on 2021-06-11 11:50 (UTC)
axolotl:
this is the closesource juicefs, not the opensource version.
The metadata using a private protocol and using S3 API to store the data. and this software is not free https://juicefs.com/pricing.
the binary file is a bash (and python) script. it will download the real juicefs to ~/.juicefs/jfsmount
arnottcr commented on 2021-06-11 07:35 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-11 07:36 (UTC) by arnottcr)
a few notes: - since you are downloading a static file, this constitutes a binary package, thus
juicefs-bin
would be the proper package name - I am very unclear where4.3.8
is coming from, since github shows0.14.2
as latest release - it appears this version is unmoored from the artefact url, as such when a new version is released, will this silently break?