Search Criteria
Package Details: kata-agent 2.2.2-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/kata-containers.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | kata-containers |
Description: | Lightweight virtual machines for containers, version 2 |
Upstream URL: | https://katacontainers.io/ |
Licenses: | Apache |
Submitter: | kshlm |
Maintainer: | denkijin |
Last Packager: | zer0def |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.007409 |
First Submitted: | 2018-07-11 14:57 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-10-14 12:59 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- go (go-gitAUR, gcc-go-gitAUR, go-sylixosAUR, gcc-go-snapshotAUR, gcc-go) (make)
- mkinitcpio (mkinitcpio-gitAUR) (make)
- pacman (pacman-gitAUR, pacman-stable-fancy-progressAUR) (make)
- rust (rust-nightlyAUR, rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rustup) (make)
- udisks2 (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
zer0def commented on 2021-08-06 11:52 (UTC)
There are booting issues with at least the Arch-based initrd, being part of the -image package, hence not worth submitting until fixed.
unknowndev commented on 2021-08-06 08:20 (UTC)
Why is the kata-containers-image related stuff commented out in pkgbuild?
zer0def commented on 2020-08-28 07:50 (UTC)
As a person not associated with the project, at this point I have no idea. I'll chalk it up to the same uncertainty as with the release timing.
Thanks for linking to the documentation, it'll probably need a bit of expanding for Podman, as well, but looks like a good starting point.
svenstaro commented on 2020-08-28 06:13 (UTC)
Thanks for your take on this. I'm also curious: Do you happen to know whether kata packaging is going to be drastically different for version 2 or whether it'll be mostly the same?
Basically, would it be useful/wise to even officially package kata 1?
About the wiki page: Thanks! That'd be a good first step for making kata on Arch quite a bit more approachable. I suppose it could borrow a lot from https://github.com/kata-containers/documentation/blob/master/install/docker/debian-docker-install.md
zer0def commented on 2020-08-28 06:03 (UTC)
If Kata's tag history is any guidance, the closest one can get to measurable anticipation of a stable release is about 2 weeks to a month after upstream posts an RC and since there is none for 2.0, nobody knows for sure.
The other thing is Kata's (optional from a package maintenance standpoint) support for other hypervisors - as of the time of writing, Firecracker and Cloud-Hypervisor, whose adoption would provide a more complete scope of software's possibilities.
As for the Wiki article - that's largely dependent on the time budget I'll end up having left and the time frame it'd have to fit in, but I'll give it a shot.
svenstaro commented on 2020-08-28 04:56 (UTC)
I'm potentially interested in maintaining this set of packages in [community] as I think this could be pretty cool for infra stuff. However, I'm curious as to whether we should wait for kata 2? Also, would you be interested in writing a Kata Containers ArchWiki article perhaps?
zer0def commented on 2019-12-11 13:11 (UTC)
Thanks psYchotic.
psYchotic commented on 2019-12-11 12:27 (UTC)
Bump version to 1.9.3-8.1: https://git.sr.ht/~otaconix/aur-kata-containers/commit/ba45411116334eff6b760b0cebb45e91223d258e
zer0def commented on 2019-09-26 19:31 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-26 19:40 (UTC) by zer0def)
@kshlm yup, just drop in
kata = ["/usr/bin/kata-runtime"]
under the[runtimes]
section in /etc/containers/libpod.conf (example file in /usr/share/containers/libpod.conf), runpodman -ti --runtime=kata alpine:edge /bin/sh
and it Just Works™.1 2 3 Next › Last »